Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Urinary Tract Infection in a Small Animal Model: Transurethral Catheterization of Male and Female Mice
Published on: December 1, 2017
Urine flow cytometry as a primary screening method to exclude urinary tract infections
K J M Boonen1, E L Koldewijn, N L A Arents
1Clinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. kristel.boonen@catharinaziekenhuis.nl
Urine flow cytometry effectively screens for urinary tract infections, achieving 100% sensitivity and zero false negatives. This method can reduce unnecessary cultures and antibiotic use in urology patients.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Microbiology
Background:
- Urine culture is the gold standard for diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) but is time-consuming and expensive.
- Current dipstick urinalysis methods lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity for reliable UTI screening.
- Urine flow cytometry presents a promising alternative for rapid and accurate UTI assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate urine flow cytometry as a screening tool to exclude urinary tract infections.
- To determine an optimal cutoff value for flow cytometry to identify negative urine cultures.
Main Methods:
- A study included 281 outpatients from a urology department.
- Urine samples were analyzed using flow cytometry and compared against urine culture results.
- Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to assess the diagnostic performance of flow cytometry and dipstick analysis.
Main Results:
- 18% of urine cultures were positive for UTIs (>10^4 CFU/mL).
- Flow cytometry demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity compared to dipstick analysis for UTI exclusion.
- A cutoff of 60 bacteria/μL via flow cytometry yielded 100% sensitivity and 60% specificity, potentially eliminating 49% of cultures and preventing unnecessary antibiotic use in 20% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Urine flow cytometry is a reliable method for excluding urinary tract infections.
- A cutoff value of 60 bacteria/μL urine provides a 100% negative predictive value, with 0% false negatives.
- Implementing flow cytometry screening could significantly decrease the number of urine cultures performed and reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions.
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Flow Cytometry
In...
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
