Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
A screening programme for hypertension in general practice
F R Taylor1, S E Gould, N A Taylor
1Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd., Grove, Wantage, Oxon, UK.
Insights
This study identified hypertension in 2.9% of patients aged 35-65. Ketanserin and metoprolol showed similar blood pressure reduction, though metoprolol decreased heart rate more.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Hypertension diagnosis and treatment rates are suboptimal.
- Effective management strategies for hypertension are crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine hypertension prevalence in a general practice population.
- To compare the efficacy of ketanserin versus metoprolol in treating hypertension.
Main Methods:
- A screening program identified patients with hypertension.
- A randomized, double-blind trial compared ketanserin and metoprolol.
- Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored over three months.
Main Results:
- Overall hypertension prevalence was 2.9%, increasing with age.
- Both ketanserin and metoprolol effectively reduced blood pressure.
- Metoprolol significantly reduced heart rate compared to ketanserin.
- No major side effects or subjective complaints were reported.
Conclusions:
- Hypertension is prevalent in this age group, with higher rates in older individuals.
- Ketanserin and metoprolol are effective antihypertensive agents.
- Metoprolol offers an additional benefit of heart rate reduction.
Abstract:
It is recommended that hypertensive patients with a diastolic blood pressure of 100 mmHg be treated. However, it has been proposed that only 50% of hypertensives are diagnosed, and of these, 50% are not treated. We therefore set out to identify hypertensive patients in our practice, who were then actively treated, some in a clinical trial of ketanserin. Of the 3,384 patients (1,667 males and 2,707 females) who were invited to our surgery for a blood pressure measurement, 2,606 patients (77%) attended. The overall prevalence of hypertension in the patients, aged 35-65 years was 2.9%. This prevalence increased with age: from 1.0% in the 35-44 year age group to 3.5% at 45-54 years, and 4.4% at 55-64 years. The mean systolic but not diastolic blood pressure increased with age. There were more male hypertensives than females, except over 55 years of age. Of the 84 hypertensives identified after one visit, the majority remained hypertensive after an additional visit, and 31 agreed to participate in a clinical trial. After a four-week placebo run-in, 22 patients had a diastolic blood pressure above 95 mmHg and were randomly allocated to receive ketanserin 40 mg twice daily or metoprolol 100 mg twice daily. Treatment continued double-blind for three months. There were no significant differences in blood pressure reduction between the treatment groups. The heart rate was reduced more by metoprolol. There were no withdrawals for side effects and no major differences in subjective complaints between the two treatment groups.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
04:37Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension V: Nursing Management