Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

Designing a dosage regimen, which refers to the manner of drug administration, is a complex process involving the selection of drug dose, route, and frequency. This process is underpinned by pharmacokinetic parameters derived from tests and population averages. These parameters are then tailored to patient-specific variables such as diagnosis, demographics, and allergy status. Once therapy commences, therapeutic response monitoring is critical and achieved through clinical and physical...

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...

Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability

Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability

Bioavailability is a crucial pharmacokinetic parameter that quantifies the proportion of an administered drug that reaches the systemic circulation and is available for therapeutic action. Regulatory agencies mandate the assessment of bioavailability, typically measured as the area under the drug plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), to ensure the efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical products. These evaluations are categorized as absolute and relative bioavailability studies.Absolute...

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Health-related quality of life in outpatients with cancer and disease-related malnutrition undergoing medical nutritional therapy: Assessment using the AnyVida scale].

Nutricion hospitalaria·2026

Same author

Noncommunicable Diseases and Nutrition Disorders in Occupational Health.

Nutrients·2026

Same author

Pathological Processes Among Content Creators on Social Media: Scoping Review.

JMIR public health and surveillance·2025

Same author

Population interest in and adequacy of the information on the safety of antineoplastic agents in the Spanish edition of Wikipedia.

PloS one·2025

Same author

[XV Jesús Culebras Lecture. Home nutrition].

Nutricion hospitalaria·2025

Same author

Public interest in drug-related problems reflected in information search trends: an infodemiological study.

Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic reviews in nutrition: standardized methodology.

Carmina Wanden-Berghe¹, Javier Sanz-Valero

¹Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Cardenal Herrera - CEU, Elche, Spain. carminaw@telefonica.net

The British Journal of Nutrition

|May 18, 2012

Summary

This study proposes a method for qualitative systematic reviews, applied to Omega-3 Fatty Acids and health. This approach enhances literature synthesis for reliable health and illness conclusions.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Health Sciences
Systematic Review Methodology

Background:

Qualitative systematic reviews are crucial for synthesizing health and illness research.
A standardized protocol is needed for consistent review preparation.

Purpose of the Study:

To establish a methodological proposal for qualitative systematic reviews.
To apply this methodology to a review of Omega-3 Fatty Acids concerning health and illness.

Main Methods:

Development of a general protocol for systematic reviews.
Systematic literature review technique focused on Omega-3 Fatty Acids.
Descriptive synthesis for collating and summarizing primary study results.

Main Results:

A methodological framework for qualitative systematic reviews was established.
The protocol provides a basis for preparing reviews on specific scientific questions.
The approach was applied to Omega-3 Fatty Acids literature.

Conclusions:

Systematic reviews effectively summarize primary research on health and illness.
Explicit methods reduce bias and random effects, yielding reliable data.
This methodology supports evidence-based decision-making in health.