Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Minimal access and standard cochlear implantation: a comparative study.

Jeremy D Prager1, Marci J Neidich, Jonathan N Perkins

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. Jeremy.Prager@childrenscolorado.org

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
|May 19, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An analysis of mechanism patterns in pediatric mandible fractures.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same author

Enhanced fortification of human milk to meet preterm infant nutritional targets.

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

Third Grade Reading Proficiency in Deaf or Hard of Hearing Children who Received Early Intervention.

Journal of early hearing detection and intervention·2025
Same author

Standard medical care versus enhanced interdisciplinary care for implementation of positive airway pressure in youth with Down syndrome: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

International expert consensus on gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss: Based on clinical trials.

Med (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Care of Infants and Children with Tracheostomies: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2025
Same journal

Postoperative complications after injection laryngoplasty for minor laryngeal clefts.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same journal

Tranexamic acid and beyond: A systematic review of pediatric post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage protocols and introduction of a universal management guideline.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same journal

Percutaneous contralateral vocal fold lateralization in pediatric bilateral vocal fold paralysis.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of single-stage excision in infected preauricular sinus: a retrospective cohort study.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same journal

Therapy changes in the treatment of subglottic laryngitis: A 30-year experience in Croatia.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same journal

Regional barriers and innovative solutions in the medical rehabilitation of children with cochlear implants in Uzbekistan: A telemonitored home-based versus center-based comparative study.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2026
See all related articles

Minimal access cochlear implantation significantly reduces operative times compared to standard techniques. This approach demonstrates comparable safety with low complication rates, suggesting it may be a superior surgical option.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Cochlear implantation is a vital treatment for severe hearing loss.
  • Standard surgical techniques involve larger incisions and longer operative times.
  • Exploring minimally invasive approaches is crucial for improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare operative times and complication rates between minimal access and standard cochlear implantation techniques.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel minimal access approach.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective comparison of 122 unilateral cochlear implantations performed between 2001-2010.
  • Minimal access technique: ~2.5-3 cm post-auricular incision with subperiosteal pocket.
  • Standard technique: ~8-10 cm "S" incision with bone well creation.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Main Results:

  • Minimal access group (73 patients) had significantly shorter mean operative times (149.5±28 min) vs. standard group (49 patients, 200±45 min).
  • Total OR time was also reduced in the minimal access group (200±31 min vs. 255±49 min).
  • Complication rates were low in both groups, with no statistically significant differences in major, technique-specific, or overall complications.

Conclusions:

  • Minimal access cochlear implantation offers reduced operative times compared to standard techniques.
  • The technique is associated with low complication rates, comparable to the standard approach.
  • Minimal access cochlear implantation presents a potentially equivalent or superior surgical option.