Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

17:06
Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
Published on: November 8, 2012
The Akaike information criterion in DCE-MRI: does it improve the haemodynamic parameter estimates?
Robert Luypaert1, Michael Ingrisch, Steven Sourbron
1Department of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
|May 19, 2012
Summary
Akaike weights (AW) can combine pharmacokinetic model estimates from DCE-MRI. However, this multimodel approach often increases bias and uncertainty, showing no systematic benefit over using complex models alone.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic modeling
- Medical imaging analysis
- Biophysical modeling
Background:
- Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Akaike weights (AW) are used to rank pharmacokinetic models based on fit and complexity.
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is crucial for assessing tissue hemodynamics.
- Combining estimates from multiple pharmacokinetic models using AW is a potential strategy to improve parameter accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Akaike weights (AW) for enhancing hemodynamic parameter estimation from DCE-MRI.
- To evaluate two multimodel approaches: 'bestmodel' selection and 'weighted model' averaging.
Main Methods:
- Pharmacokinetic models, including the two-compartment exchange model (2CXM), uptake model, and extended Tofts model, were utilized.
- Data were simulated using the 2CXM under various experimental and tissue conditions.
- Two multimodel approaches combining model estimates based on AW were explored: 'bestmodel' and 'weighted model'.
Main Results:
- Both 'bestmodel' and 'weighted model' approaches, while beneficial in some instances, frequently led to increased bias and/or uncertainty in parameter estimates.
- Simulation results indicated that the Akaike criterion did not offer a systematic advantage over using only the more complex two-compartment exchange model (2CXM).
Conclusions:
- The application of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Akaike weights (AW) in multimodel approaches for DCE-MRI parameter estimation may not consistently improve results.
- The findings suggest that relying solely on a more complex model, like the 2CXM, might be preferable to multimodel averaging or selection strategies based on AIC in certain scenarios.
