Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory accessory effects on visual processing.

P J Keuss1, F van der Zee, M B van den Bree

  • 1Dept. of Cognitive Psychology, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Acta Psychologica
|October 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

No support for association between the dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene and ADHD.

American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics·2005
Same author

Focused attention reduces the effect of lateral interference in multi-element arrays.

Psychological research·2001
Same author

A twin study on sensation seeking, risk taking behavior and marijuana use.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2001
Same author

Family history influence on drug abuse severity and treatment outcome.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2001
Same author

Environmental transmission of DSM-IV substance use disdorders in adoptive and step families.

Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research·2001
Same author

Anaerobic biodegradability of alkylphenols and fuel oxygenates in the presence of alternative electron acceptors.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2000

Non-informative sound enhances reaction time to visual stimuli. This auditory facilitation primarily impacts the feature extraction stage, especially for degraded visual signals.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory-visual interaction

Background:

  • Intersensory facilitation describes how stimuli from one sensory modality can enhance performance in another.
  • Previous research suggested auditory stimuli might activate motor responses.
  • The specific processing stages influenced by auditory input in visual tasks were unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how non-informative auditory stimuli affect visual reaction time.
  • To determine if auditory facilitation impacts early perceptual or later motor stages.
  • To explore the interaction between auditory input and visual stimulus quality.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments involving visual stimuli presented with non-informative auditory tones.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulation of auditory intensity (30/80 dB) and visual stimulus degradation.
  • Measurement of choice reaction time to assess facilitation effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Low to moderate intensity sound significantly reduced visual reaction time.
    • Auditory facilitation was independent of visual signal intensity and duration.
    • The facilitatory effect was more pronounced for degraded visual stimuli compared to intact ones.

    Conclusions:

    • Non-informative sound facilitates visual processing, particularly at the feature extraction stage.
    • Auditory input influences early perceptual processing rather than solely motor adjustment.
    • This suggests a more complex role for cross-modal interactions in perception.