Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Protein Networks

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Margin of Error

Margin of Error

The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.

Biological Effects of Radiation

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Promoting Family/Friend Involvement in Care Planning in Care Homes: A Qualitative Exploration of the Usefulness and Relevance of an Information Resource.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026

Same author

Weak-to-strong generalization enables fully automated training of multi-head mask-RCNN model for segmenting densely overlapping cell nuclei in multiplex whole-slice brain images.

Frontiers in bioinformatics·2026

Same author

Independent Head-to-Head Comparison of Commercial Artificial Intelligence Devices for Lung Cancer Detection on Chest Radiographs.

Radiology·2026

Same author

Continuity of care in UK primary care: a scoping review of measures, challenges, and future interventions.

Primary health care research & development·2026

Same author

Improved prostate diffusion imaging using deep learning denoising and phase correction with ultra-high-density coil array.

Radiology advances·2026

Same author

The Use of the Rox Index to Guide High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy and the Need for Intubation Is Associated With Meaningful Patient Outcomes.

CHEST critical care·2026

Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software

Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software

Published on: December 14, 2020

NetMets: software for quantifying and visualizing errors in biological network segmentation.

David Mayerich¹, Chris Bjornsson, Jonathan Taylor

¹Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA. mayerich@illinois.edu

BMC Bioinformatics

|May 22, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate segmentation of biological networks in 3D data is crucial. This study introduces a novel metric for comparing network models, considering both geometry and connectivity for improved segmentation algorithm evaluation.

More Related Videos

Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench

Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench

Published on: August 23, 2017

Visualization of the Interstitial Cells of Cajal ICC Network in Mice

Visualization of the Interstitial Cells of Cajal ICC Network in Mice

Published on: July 27, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software

Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software

Published on: December 14, 2020

Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench

Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench

Published on: August 23, 2017

Visualization of the Interstitial Cells of Cajal ICC Network in Mice

Visualization of the Interstitial Cells of Cajal ICC Network in Mice

Published on: July 27, 2011

Area of Science:

Biomedical image processing
Computational biology
Network analysis

Background:

Accurate segmentation of biological networks (e.g., neurons, microvasculature) in volumetric data is a major challenge in biomedical imaging.
Existing segmentation algorithms often lack generalizability across diverse datasets.
A key limitation is the absence of robust quantitative metrics for comparing algorithm performance against ground truth.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a robust metric for measuring and visualizing differences between biological network models.
To address the need for improved quantitative comparison of network segmentation algorithms.

Main Methods:

Proposed a novel algorithm to measure network similarity.
The metric incorporates both geometric structure and connectivity information.
Visualized metric differences by mapping them onto explicit network models.

Main Results:

The developed metric effectively quantifies differences between network models.
The approach considers both topological and geometric aspects of biological networks.
Enables quantitative comparison and visualization of segmentation results.

Conclusions:

The proposed metric enhances the evaluation of biological network segmentation algorithms.
This work provides a foundation for developing more general-purpose segmentation tools.
Improved quantitative assessment will drive advancements in analyzing complex biological structures.