Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
Published on: February 8, 2019
Infants use different mechanisms to make small and large number ordinal judgments
1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. vanmarlek@missouri.edu
Insights
Infants may use separate systems for small and large quantities. This study shows infants struggle to compare small and large number sets, supporting distinct numerical representation mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive development
- Infant cognition
- Numerical cognition
Background:
- Infants may possess distinct numerical representation systems: object tracking for small quantities (<4) and analog magnitude for larger quantities (≥4).
- Previous evidence is indirect, necessitating direct testing of this two-mechanism hypothesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To directly investigate the hypothesis that infants utilize separate mechanisms for representing small and large numerosities.
- To determine if these distinct numerical representations are comparable.
Main Methods:
- An ordinal choice task was employed with 10- to 12-month-old infants.
- Infants were presented with choices between hidden sets of food items representing different numerosities.
Main Results:
- Infants successfully discriminated between numerosities within small sets (1 vs. 2) and within large sets (4 vs. 8).
- Performance dropped to chance levels when comparing a small set to a large set (e.g., 2 vs. 4), even with large ratios (2 vs. 8).
Conclusions:
- The findings provide direct support for the two-mechanism hypothesis of numerical representation in infants.
- Numerical representations from the object tracking system and the analog magnitude mechanism appear to be incommensurable, meaning they cannot be directly compared or translated between each other.
Abstract:
Previous research has shown indirectly that infants may use two different mechanisms--an object tracking system and an analog magnitude mechanism--to represent small (<4) and large (≥4) numbers of objects, respectively. The current study directly tested this hypothesis in an ordinal choice task by presenting 10- to 12-month-olds with a choice between different numbers of hidden food items. Infants reliably chose the larger amount when choosing between two exclusively small (1 vs. 2) or large (4 vs. 8) sets, but they performed at chance when one set was small and the other was large (2 vs. 4) even when the ratio between the sets was very favorable (2 vs. 8). The current findings support the two-mechanism hypothesis and, furthermore, suggest that the representations from the object tracking system and the analog magnitude mechanism are incommensurable.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the concrete...
Nominal Level of Measurement
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal scale is...
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
Ranks

