Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Coronary stenting versus bypass surgery in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction
Zeng-ming Xue1, Wei-ju Li, Chang-sheng Ma
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) show similar mortality rates for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) patients. PCI had more repeat procedures, while CABG had higher in-hospital mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Optimal revascularization strategy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is not well-defined.
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently coexists with HFPEF, necessitating treatment decisions.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are potential revascularization options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of PCI versus CABG in patients diagnosed with both CAD and HFPEF.
- To evaluate mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebral vascular events (MACCE) between the two revascularization strategies.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 920 patients with CAD and HFPEF (ejection fraction ≥ 50%) were analyzed.
- Patients underwent either PCI (n=350) or CABG (n=570) between July 2003 and September 2005.
- Outcomes assessed included mortality, MACCE (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization) at a median follow-up of 543 days.
Main Results:
- In-hospital mortality was significantly lower following PCI compared to CABG (0.3% vs. 2.5%, P=0.016).
- No significant difference in overall mortality rates was observed during follow-up (2.3% vs. 3.5%, P=0.423).
- PCI patients experienced higher MACCE rates, primarily due to increased repeat revascularization (13.4% vs. 4.0%, P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- PCI and CABG demonstrate comparable long-term mortality outcomes in patients with CAD and HFPEF.
- PCI is associated with a higher incidence of repeat revascularization compared to CABG.
- Age, NYHA class, and chronic total occlusion are independent predictors of mortality in this patient group.
Background:
The optimal revascularization strategy in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with HFPEF.
Methods:
From July 2003 through September 2005, a total of 920 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and HFPEF (ejection fraction ≥ 50%) underwent PCI (n = 350) or CABG (n = 570). We compared the groups with respect to the primary outcome of mortality, and the secondary outcomes of main adverse cardiac and cerebral vascular events (MACCE), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke and repeat revascularization, at a median follow-up of 543 days.
Results:
In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the PCI group than in the CABG group (0.3% vs. 2.5%, adjusted P = 0.016). During follow-up, there was no significant difference in the two groups with regard to mortality rates (2.3% vs. 3.5%, adjusted P = 0.423). Patients receiving PCI had higher MACCE rates as compared with patients receiving CABG (13.4% vs. 4.0%, adjusted P < 0.001), mainly due to higher rate of repeat revascularization (adjusted P < 0.001). Independent predictors of mortality were age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and chronic total occlusion.
Conclusion:
Among patients with CAD and HFPEF, PCI was shown to be as good as CABG with respect to the mortality rate, although there was a higher rate of repeat revascularization in patients undergoing PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
