Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
Published on: August 18, 2023
Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma contains strategies that dominate any evolutionary opponent
William H Press1, Freeman J Dyson
1Department of Computer Science and School of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. wpress@cs.utexas.edu
Abstract:
The two-player Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game is a model for both sentient and evolutionary behaviors, especially including the emergence of cooperation. It is generally assumed that there exists no simple ultimatum strategy whereby one player can enforce a unilateral claim to an unfair share of rewards. Here, we show that such strategies unexpectedly do exist. In particular, a player X who is witting of these strategies can (i) deterministically set her opponent Y's score, independently of his strategy or response, or (ii) enforce an extortionate linear relation between her and his scores. Against such a player, an evolutionary player's best response is to accede to the extortion. Only a player with a theory of mind about his opponent can do better, in which case Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma is an Ultimatum Game.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Limits to Natural Selection
Competition
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Types of Selection
Inclusive Fitness