Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Interdisciplinary research on patient-provider communication: a cross-method comparison.
Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou1, Paul Han, Alison Pilsner
1Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. chouws@mail.nih.gov
Assessing patient-provider communication requires careful method selection. This study compared three methods, finding that simple ratings differed significantly from detailed analyses like RIAS and discourse analysis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Health Communication
- Qualitative Research Methods
Background:
- Effective patient-provider communication is crucial for quality healthcare.
- Various methods exist for assessing communication, including satisfaction surveys and direct observation.
- Understanding the strengths and limitations of each assessment method is vital for selecting appropriate tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare three distinct methods for assessing patient-provider communication using the same dataset.
- To evaluate the utility of dichotomized ratings, Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS), and inductive discourse analysis.
- To explore the potential of an integrated assessment approach.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of ten videotaped simulated patient-student encounters.
- Application of three assessment techniques: dichotomized Standardized Patient (SP) ratings, RIAS, and inductive discourse analysis.
- Pilot testing of a combined assessment approach by blinded coders.
Main Results:
- Dichotomized SP ratings showed a stark contrast between good and poor communication, which was not reflected in RIAS or discourse analysis.
- Each method yielded different insights into communication dynamics.
- An integrated approach combining qualitative and quantitative data showed promise.
Conclusions:
- Different assessment methods for patient-provider communication yield distinct results.
- Simple rating scales may oversimplify complex communication interactions.
- An integrative approach offers a more nuanced and quantifiable evaluation of clinical encounters.
Related Concept Videos
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution itself.
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
Communication
Within...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
