Temporal Requirements of cMyc Protein for Reprogramming Mouse Fibroblasts
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Direct Reprogramming of Mouse Fibroblasts into Melanocytes
Published on: August 27, 2021
Corey Heffernan1, Huseyin Sumer, Luis F Malaver-Ortega
1Cell Reprogramming and Stem Cells Laboratory, Centre for Reproduction and Development, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Abstract:
Exogenous expression of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and cMyc forces mammalian somatic cells to adopt molecular and phenotypic characteristics of embryonic stem cells, commencing with the required suppression of lineage-associated genes (e.g., Thy1 in mouse). Although omitting cMyc from the reprogramming cocktail minimizes risks of uncontrolled proliferation, its exclusion results in fold reductions in reprogramming efficiency. Thus, the feasibility of substituting cMyc transgene with (non-integrative) recombinant "pTAT-mcMyc" protein delivery was assessed, without compromising reprogramming efficiency or the pluripotent phenotype. Purification and delivery of semisoluble/particulate pTAT-mcMyc maintained Oct4-GFP(+) colony formation (i.e., reprogramming efficiency) whilst supporting pluripotency by various criteria. Differential repression of Thy1 by pTAT-mcMyc ± Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4 (OSK) suggested differential (and non-additive) mechanisms of repression. Extending these findings, attempts to enhance reprogramming efficiency through a staggered approach (prerepression of Thy1) failed to improve reprogramming efficiency. We consider protein delivery a useful tool to decipher temporal/molecular events characterizing somatic cell reprogramming.
Insights
Recombinant protein delivery of Myc (pTAT-mcMyc) successfully replaced the cMyc gene in somatic cell reprogramming, maintaining efficiency and pluripotency without uncontrolled cell growth risks.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Somatic cell reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) typically requires Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and cMyc.
- Excluding cMyc reduces proliferation risks but significantly lowers reprogramming efficiency.
- Alternative methods for delivering reprogramming factors are needed to optimize safety and efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility of using recombinant pTAT-mcMyc protein delivery as a substitute for the cMyc transgene.
- To determine if pTAT-mcMyc delivery can maintain reprogramming efficiency and pluripotency without compromising safety.
- To investigate the mechanisms of Thy1 repression by cMyc and other reprogramming factors.
Main Methods:
- Purification and delivery of recombinant pTAT-mcMyc protein to somatic cells.
- Assessment of reprogramming efficiency via Oct4-GFP(+) colony formation.
- Evaluation of pluripotency markers and lineage gene (Thy1) repression.
- Comparison of protein delivery with traditional transgene-based methods.
Main Results:
- pTAT-mcMyc protein delivery successfully maintained reprogramming efficiency and pluripotency.
- The protein delivery method did not increase risks of uncontrolled proliferation.
- Differential repression of Thy1 was observed, suggesting complex regulatory mechanisms.
- Staggered delivery approaches did not enhance reprogramming efficiency.
Conclusions:
- Recombinant protein delivery of cMyc is a viable alternative to transgenes for somatic cell reprogramming.
- This method offers a safer approach by avoiding risks associated with cMyc transgenes.
- Protein delivery serves as a valuable tool for dissecting the molecular events in cellular reprogramming.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming

