Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

An Intact Pericardium Ischemic Rodent Model
Published on: September 2, 2021
Contemporary etiologies, risk factors, and outcomes after pericardiectomy
Timothy J George1, George J Arnaoutakis, Claude A Beaty
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Insights
Pericardiectomy is a safe surgery for constrictive pericarditis, but survival varies by cause. Post-radiation pericarditis and low albumin levels significantly reduce long-term survival rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Thoracic Surgery
- Medical Research
Background:
- The causes of constrictive pericarditis have evolved, impacting surgical pericardiectomy indications and complexity.
- This study evaluates a single-center's experience with pericardiectomy in a contemporary patient cohort.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define the etiologies, risk factors, and outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis.
- To analyze survival rates and identify predictors of mortality in patients undergoing pericardiectomy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 98 adult patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive disease from 1995 to 2010.
- Evaluation of demographic, comorbid, operative, and outcome data.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression for mortality risk factors.
Main Results:
- Idiopathic (44), postoperative (30), and post-radiation (17) were the most common etiologies.
- Overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 82.5%, 64.3%, and 49.2%.
- Post-radiation etiology and hypoalbuminemia were associated with decreased long-term survival, while cardiopulmonary bypass predicted 30-day mortality.
Conclusions:
- Pericardiectomy remains a safe procedure for constrictive pericarditis, despite variations in survival based on etiology.
- Post-radiation pericarditis and hypoalbuminemia are critical risk factors impacting long-term patient survival.
Background:
The leading causes of constrictive pericarditis have changed over time leading to a commensurate change in the indications and complexity of surgical pericardiectomy. We evaluated our single-center experience to define the etiologies, risk factors, and outcomes of pericardiectomy in a modern cohort.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for all patients who underwent total or partial pericardiectomy. Demographic, comorbid, operative, and outcome data were evaluated. Survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models examined risk factors for mortality.
Results:
From 1995 to 2010, 98 adults underwent pericardiectomy for constrictive disease. The most common etiologies were idiopathic (n=44), postoperative (n=30), and post radiation (n=17). Total pericardiectomy was performed in 94 cases, most commonly through a sternotomy (n=93). Thirty-three cases were redo sternotomies, 34 underwent a concomitant procedure, and 34 required cardiopulmonary bypass. Overall in-hospital, 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates were 92.9%, 82.5%, 64.3%, and 49.2%, respectively. Survival differed sharply by etiology with idiopathic, postoperative, and post-radiation 5-year survivals of 79.8%, 55.9%, and 11.0%, respectively (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, only the need for cardiopulmonary bypass (hazard ratio [HR]: 21.2, p=0.02) was predictive of 30-day mortality while post-radiation etiology (HR: 3.19, p=0.02) and hypoalbuminemia (HR: 0.57, p=0.03) were associated with increased 10-year mortality.
Conclusions:
Although survival varies significantly by etiology, pericardiectomy continues to be a safe operation for constrictive pericarditis. Post-radiation pericarditis and hypoalbuminemia are significant risk factors for decreased long-term survival.
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis I: Introduction
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
