Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Cardiac chambers perforation by pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Own experience in diagnosis,
Andrzej Maziarz1, Andrzej Ząbek, Barbara Małecka
1Department of Electrocardiology, The John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland. buna@wp.pl
Insights
Cardiac perforation from pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is a rare but serious risk. Early diagnosis and appropriate lead removal techniques are crucial for patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Cardiac chamber perforation is a rare but serious complication following pacemaker (PM) or cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation.
- Clinical presentation varies based on timing, perforation site, and associated injuries.
Observation:
- Diagnosis involves clinical assessment, ECG, device interrogation, echocardiography, X-ray, and CT scans.
- Seven cases of perforation were analyzed, with perforating leads removed in all instances.
- New pacing systems were implanted in five patients.
Findings:
- Operative techniques for lead removal included direct traction, Cook system, or surgical pericardial drainage.
- The choice of technique depended on implantation-to-perforation time, extra-organ lesions, and pericardial effusion.
- Preventive measures focus on avoiding specific lead placements (RV apex/free wall, RA free anterolateral wall), excessive lead tension, and over-screwing the helix.
Implications:
- Proper lead placement and implantation technique are critical for preventing cardiac perforation.
- Timely diagnosis and appropriate management strategies are essential for successful lead removal and patient recovery.
- Understanding risk factors aids in developing safer implantation protocols for cardiac electronic devices.
Abstract:
Cardiac chamber perforation is an uncommon, but potentially dangerous, complication of implantation of a pacemaker (PM) or a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Different clinical presentations are related to the time between implantation and perforation, localisation of the perforation and concomitant lesions in neighbouring organs. Diagnosis is based on concomitant analysis of the clinical picture, ECG tracings, PM or ICD function check-up with a programmer, and review of echocardiographic, X-ray and computed tomography pictures. We analysed seven cases of perforation. Perforating leads were removed in all cases and a new pacing system was implanted in five cases. Choice of operative technique (unscrewing and direct traction from device pocket, Cook system or surgical procedure with pericardial drainage) depended on the time elapsing between implantation and perforation, the presence of lesions of other organs, and the amount of fluid in the pericardial sac. Avoiding unsafe localisation of a pacing electrode in the apex and free wall of the right ventricle and in the free anterolateral wall of the right atrium, and avoiding leaving an extra length of pacing lead under tension and overscrewing of the lead helix seem to be the best ways of prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
