Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coding intensity variation in Medicare Advantage.

Health affairs scholar·2025
Same author

Primary Care Physicians In Medicare Advantage Were Less Costly, Provided Similar Quality Versus Regional Average.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2024
Same author

Development of a model to predict antidepressant treatment response for depression among Veterans.

Psychological medicine·2023
Same author

Changes in the Use of Long-Term Medications Following Incident Dementia Diagnosis.

JAMA internal medicine·2023
Same author

Antidepressant use in low- middle- and high-income countries: a World Mental Health Surveys report.

Psychological medicine·2023
Same author

Differences In Use Of Services And Quality Of Care In Medicare Advantage And Traditional Medicare, 2010 And 2017.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Multilevel interventions: study design and analysis issues.

Paul D Cleary1, Cary P Gross, Alan M Zaslavsky

  • 1Yale School of Public Health, 60 College St., LEPH 210, PO Box 208034, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA. paul.cleary@yale.edu

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
|May 25, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Multilevel interventions, targeting various levels like individual and community, aim for sustained health behavior changes. More research is needed to prove their effectiveness and efficiency compared to single-level approaches.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design
06:18

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design

Published on: December 3, 2020

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design
06:18

Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design

Published on: December 3, 2020

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Public Health Interventions
  • Cancer Control

Background:

  • Multilevel interventions are increasingly proposed for cancer prevention, detection, and treatment.
  • These interventions are believed to yield more substantial and sustained behavior changes than single-level approaches.
  • Understanding the relationship between intervention components, patient outcomes, and implementation barriers is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review designs for assessing multilevel interventions.
  • To explore analytic methods for controlling confounding variables in multilevel data.
  • To guide research on the value and efficiency of multilevel interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of research designs for multilevel intervention assessment.
  • Discussion of analytical strategies for complex multilevel data.
  • Emphasis on research that explicates contributions of different intervention levels.

Main Results:

  • Current designs for assessing multilevel interventions are uncommon.
  • Multilevel interventions are complex and expensive to implement and evaluate.
  • Evidence on the value of multilevel interventions is limited.

Conclusions:

  • Further multilevel research is essential to demonstrate the superiority and efficiency of multilevel interventions over focused approaches.
  • Understanding the specific contributions of each intervention level is key.
  • This research will inform effective and efficient strategies for improving cancer care.