Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Cardiovascular risk age: concepts and practicalities
Marie Therese Cooney1, Erkki Vartiainen, Tiina Laatikainen
1Department of Cardiology, Adelaide Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Insights
Risk age is a novel way to communicate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, especially for younger individuals. This method helps patients understand their risk level, potentially encouraging healthier lifestyle choices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular disease risk assessment
- Preventive cardiology
- Health communication
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk increases with age and risk factors.
- A younger individual with multiple risk factors can have a similar risk profile to an older individual with fewer risk factors.
- The concept of 'risk age' aims to provide a more intuitive understanding of an individual's CVD risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive a generic equation for calculating risk age.
- To construct risk age charts for practical application.
- To investigate if risk age remains consistent across different cardiovascular disease (CVD) endpoints.
Main Methods:
- A generic 10-year CVD risk formula was equated to a formula with ideal risk factors to solve for 'risk age' (x).
- Risk ages were calculated for participants in the FINRISK study using both fatal CVD events and total CVD events (fatal and non-fatal).
- The correlation between risk ages derived from different endpoints was analyzed.
Main Results:
- A generic equation for risk age was successfully derived.
- A specific table for Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk ages was created due to age being a baseline factor in that system.
- Risk age demonstrated consistency across different CVD endpoints (fatal vs. total events).
- The derived risk age equation is independent of baseline survival, negating the need for recalibration.
Conclusions:
- Risk age offers an intuitive communication tool for CVD risk, particularly beneficial for younger patients.
- Utilizing risk age may encourage younger individuals to adopt healthier lifestyles.
- Clinical decisions regarding CVD prevention should still primarily rely on absolute risk assessment as per current guidelines.
Objectives:
A young person with many risk factors may have the same level of risk as an older person with no risk factors. Thus a high-risk 40-year-old may have a risk age of 60 years or more. The aim of the study was to derive a generic equation for risk age, construct risk age charts, and explore the hypothesis that risk age is similar regardless of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) end point used.
Methods:
The equation was generated by equating the generic formula for 10-year CVD risk (with unknown risk factor levels) to the generic formula for 10-year CVD risk in a person with age = x and ideal risk factor levels (total cholesterol 4 mmol/l, systolic blood pressure 120 mm Hg, and non-smoker) and solving for x. To examine the consistency between risk ages for different end points, a risk age based on risk of CVD fatal events and based on risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events was derived for each of the participants in the FINRISK population study. The correlation between these risk ages was examined.
Results:
A generic equation for risk age was derived. The generic equation could not be used for SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation), because the age is included in the baseline. Therefore a table of SCORE risk ages was developed by looking up the risk age corresponding to each combination of risk factors in the chart. Risk age remains similar regardless of the cardiovascular end point used, which bypasses the dilemma of whether to use a risk-estimation system based on CVD mortality or on the more attractive but less reliable end point of total CVD events. On the basis of the equation, risk age is not dependent on baseline survival and therefore recalibration is not required.
Conclusions:
Risk age is an intuitive and easily understood method for communicating about risk, particularly in younger patients, and may facilitate lifestyle change in younger patients. However, treatment decisions should be based on absolute risk, as recommended by guidelines on CVD prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
