Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026
09:51
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Minimally invasive versus conventional joint arthroplasty
Nicholas A Kenney1, Kevin W Farmer
1Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Summary
Minimally invasive surgery offers new options for osteoarthritis pain relief, potentially delaying or preventing total joint replacement. This review examines these techniques for hip, knee, and shoulder osteoarthritis.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Increasing demand for surgical treatment of osteoarthritis in the knee, hip, and shoulder.
- Traditional treatment involves total joint replacements, but newer options are emerging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review minimally invasive surgical options for hip, knee, and shoulder osteoarthritis.
- To examine the application, limitations, outcomes, and complications of these procedures.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on minimally invasive surgical techniques for osteoarthritis.
- Comparison with traditional total joint arthroplasty outcomes and complications.
Main Results:
- Minimally invasive procedures offer varied results for osteoarthritis treatment.
- These techniques may enhance patient outcomes and delay or prevent future total joint arthroplasty.
Conclusions:
- Minimally invasive surgery presents promising alternatives for osteoarthritis management.
- Careful patient selection and understanding of limitations are crucial for optimal outcomes.
