Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who do not undergo reperfusion
Frances O Wood1, Nicholas A Leonowicz, Thomas E Vanhecke
1William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA. frances.wood@beaumont.edu
Insights
For ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI) patients not receiving reperfusion therapy, advanced age and comorbidities were common reasons for non-treatment. Outcomes were poor, with high in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Reperfusion therapy significantly reduces mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI).
- However, a subset of STEMI patients do not receive reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention).
- The decision-making process and clinical outcomes for these non-reperfusion STEMI patients are not well-characterized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the characteristics, reasons for non-reperfusion, management, and outcomes of STEMI patients who did not undergo reperfusion therapy.
- To identify factors associated with mortality in this specific patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 139 STEMI patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy.
- Data collected from October 2006 to March 2011 at a high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center.
- Analysis included clinical data, reasons for no reperfusion, management strategies, and in-hospital and 1-year mortality.
Main Results:
- The study included 139 STEMI patients (mean age 80±13 years; 61% women) who did not receive reperfusion therapy.
- Common reasons for no reperfusion included advanced age, comorbidities, kidney injury, delayed presentation, advance directives, patient preference, and dementia; 60% had ≥3 reasons.
- In-hospital mortality was 53%, and 1-year mortality was 69%. Cardiogenic shock, intubation, and advance directives were associated with higher mortality.
Conclusions:
- In a high-volume PCI center, STEMI patients not receiving reperfusion therapy often have multiple contributing factors for this decision, with advanced age being most common.
- This population experiences significantly high mortality rates, with less than half surviving hospitalization.
- Further research may be needed to optimize care for this high-risk STEMI subgroup.
Abstract:
Reperfusion therapy reduces mortality in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI). However, some patients may not receive thrombolytic therapy or undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The decision making and clinical outcomes of these patients have not been well described. In this study, 139 patients were identified from a total of 1,126 patients with STEMI who did not undergo reperfusion therapy at a high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center from October 2006 to March 2011. Clinical data, reasons for no reperfusion, management, and mortality were obtained by chart review. The mean age was 80 ± 13 years (61% women, 31% diabetic, and 37% known coronary artery disease). Of the 139 patients, 72 (52%) presented with primary diagnoses other than STEMI, and 39 (28%) developed STEMI >24 hours after admission. The most common reasons for no reperfusion were advanced age, co-morbid conditions, acute or chronic kidney injury, delayed presentation, advance directives precluding reperfusion, patient preference, and dementia. Eighty-four patients (60%) had ≥ 3 reasons for no reperfusion. Factors associated with hospital mortality were cardiogenic shock, intubation, and advance directives prohibiting reperfusion after physician consultation. In hospital and 1-year mortality were 53% and 69%, respectively. In conclusion, at a high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center, most patients presenting with STEMI underwent immediate catheterization. The decision for no reperfusion was multifactorial, with advanced age reported as the most common factor. Outcomes were poor in this population, and fewer than half of these patients survived to hospital discharge.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
09:23Confirmation of Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury in Mice Using Surface Pad Electrocardiography
Published on: November 24, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...