Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

A Duplex Digital PCR Assay for Simultaneous Quantification of the Enterococcus spp. and the Human Fecal-associated HF183 Marker in Waters
Published on: March 9, 2016
Duplex RT-qPCR for the detection of hepatitis E virus in water, using a process control
Sandra Martin-Latil1, Catherine Hennechart-Collette, Laurent Guillier
1ANSES, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Food and Water Virology Unit, Maisons-Alfort, France.
This study developed a new method to detect hepatitis E virus (HEV) in water samples. The method uses filtration to concentrate the virus, followed by direct lysis and RNA extraction. A one-step RT-qPCR was used to detect HEV RNA and a process control virus called MNV-1. The process control helps ensure accurate results by monitoring false negatives. The method was tested on bottled and tap water and found to detect HEV at low concentrations. The detection limit was between 700 and 3500 HEV genome copies per 0.5L of water. The use of MNV-1 as a process control improved the reliability of the results. The study shows that this method is suitable for routine use in diagnostic laboratories for HEV surveillance in water.
Area of Science:
- Viral detection in environmental samples
- Molecular diagnostics in water safety
- RNA virus analysis in public health
Background:
Current methods for detecting human hepatitis E virus (HEV) in water samples face limitations due to low infectious doses and the absence of reliable cell culture techniques. Reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) is widely adopted for RNA virus detection, but requires a process control to ensure accurate results. While HEV genotype III is emerging as a public health concern in industrialized nations, routine monitoring remains challenging. The lack of a standardized, sensitive, and rapid detection method for HEV in water hinders effective surveillance. Prior research has shown that HEV contamination occurs through food and water, but no prior work had resolved the issue of false-negative results due to technical inefficiencies. This gap motivated the development of a method that integrates virus concentration and process control in a single workflow. The absence of a reliable process control in existing protocols limits diagnostic confidence. This study addresses the need for a robust and efficient detection system that can be used in routine diagnostic settings.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to develop a rapid and sensitive method for detecting HEV in water samples. The focus was on addressing the limitations of current detection methods, particularly the lack of process control to monitor false-negative results. The method integrates virus concentration and RT-qPCR amplification in a streamlined workflow. The study sought to improve the reliability of HEV detection in routine laboratory settings. The specific problem addressed was the difficulty in detecting low HEV concentrations in water due to technical variability. The motivation stemmed from the increasing public health concerns related to HEV contamination in water. The study aimed to provide a solution that is both sensitive and practical for diagnostic use. The goal was to ensure accurate detection by incorporating a reliable process control into the detection protocol.
Main Methods:
The method involved concentrating HEV from water samples by filtration on membrane filters. Adsorbed viruses were directly lysed from the filters before RNA extraction. RT-qPCR amplification followed the RNA extraction step. A one-step duplex RT-qPCR was developed to detect HEV RNA in parallel with a process control. Murine norovirus (MNV-1) was used as the process control to monitor false-negative results. The method was tested on bottled and tap water samples to determine its effectiveness. The filtration and lysis steps were optimized to maximize virus recovery. The RT-qPCR was designed to detect HEV and monitor the process control simultaneously.
Main Results:
The developed method achieved a detection limit of 700 to 3500 HEV genome copies per 0.5L of bottled water. In tap water samples, the detection limit was 3500 HEV genome copies per 0.5L. The use of MNV-1 as a process control improved the reliability of the results. The method successfully detected HEV in low-concentration water samples. The process control effectively monitored false-negative results in the detection workflow. The RT-qPCR amplification was efficient and consistent across all tested samples. The filtration and lysis steps provided sufficient virus recovery for accurate detection. The method proved to be a valuable tool for routine diagnostic laboratories.
Conclusions:
The study demonstrated that the developed method is a reliable and sensitive approach for detecting HEV in water. The use of MNV-1 as a process control was effective in monitoring false-negative results. The method's detection limits were suitable for routine monitoring in diagnostic settings. The streamlined workflow of virus concentration and RT-qPCR amplification improved detection efficiency. The authors propose that this method can be used in routine diagnostic laboratories for HEV surveillance. The integration of a process control enhances the reliability of the detection process. The results suggest that the method is suitable for both bottled and tap water samples. The study supports the use of this method for improving HEV detection in environmental monitoring.
Frequently Asked Questions
The study developed a reliable method for detecting HEV in water with a detection limit of 700 to 3500 genome copies per 0.5L.
MNV-1 was used as a process control to monitor false-negative results during HEV detection.
Virus concentration was achieved by filtration on membrane filters followed by direct lysis of adsorbed viruses.
RT-qPCR was used to amplify and detect HEV RNA after RNA extraction from concentrated samples.
The detection limit was 700 to 3500 HEV genome copies per 0.5L of bottled water.
The authors propose that the method is suitable for routine diagnostic laboratories for HEV detection in water.

