Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
Published on: October 19, 2014
Relationships among defensive styles, cognitive styles, processing styles, and attentional styles of normal
1University of Alabama-Tuscaloosa.
Abstract:
Cognitive and psychodynamic theorists agree that an individual's personality and behavior are determined by both cognitive and dynamic processes. This study examined the relationship among three cognitive approaches--cognitive style, attentional style, and processing style--and examined their relations to defensive style. Adolescents from Grades 11 and 12 (146 boys, 164 girls) were examined in groups for cognitive style (Group Embedded Figures Test), attentional style (Test of Attentional and Interpersonal Style), processing style (a sequential/simultaneous processing test battery), and defensive style (Defense Mechanism Inventory). Least squares completely randomized two-way analyses of variance (or analyses of covariance where applicable) were employed to assess the relations among the three cognitive measures and/or between the cognitive measures and defensive style. While most comparisons were nonsignificant, a significant relationship was observed between sequential processing and field-dependence and between simultaneous processing and field-independence. Also, a trend was noted between field-independence and ideational defenses and between field-dependence and repression-based defenses.
More Related Videos
05:32Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos
Published on: December 7, 2018
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Attachment Styles
Hazan and Shaver's Attachment Styles