Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
A multi-stage approach to maximizing geocoding success in a large population-based cohort study through automated and
Jennifer S Sonderman1, Michael T Mumma, Sarah S Cohen
1International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Jennifer@iei.us
A new geocoding protocol successfully assigned geographic coordinates to 99.96% of addresses in a large cohort study. This method enhances spatial analysis capabilities for large-scale health research.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
- Public Health
Background:
- Large-scale prospective cohort studies require accurate spatial data for geographic analyses.
- Geocoding participant addresses is crucial for linking health outcomes to environmental exposures.
- Previous geocoding methods often struggle with high match rates in extensive, geographically diverse populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and implement a multi-stage geocoding protocol to maximize address-level geographic coordinate assignment for a large prospective cohort study.
- To improve the efficiency and accuracy of geocoding for spatial analyses in epidemiological research.
- To assess factors influencing geocoding success rates in a large, multi-state cohort.
Main Methods:
- A multi-stage geocoding protocol involving address parsing, cleaning, standardization, and a combination of automated and interactive tools was developed.
- Multiple base maps were utilized to enhance automated geocoding accuracy.
- Statistical analyses, including odds ratios and confidence intervals, were used to evaluate the influence of population density and data collection methods on geocoding outcomes.
Main Results:
- The geocoding protocol increased the non-Post Office (PO) Box match rate from 74.5% to 97.6%.
- Overall, 99.96% of participant addresses were geocoded, with only 5.2% resolved to the ZIP code centroid level.
- Low population density (<44 persons/km2) and in-person interviews significantly increased the likelihood of requiring resource-intensive interactive geocoding.
Conclusions:
- A comprehensive, multi-stage geocoding protocol can achieve high address-level accuracy in large-scale, geographically dispersed cohort studies.
- Population density and the method of address ascertainment are critical factors influencing automated geocoding success.
- The developed protocol significantly enhances the feasibility of spatial analyses in large epidemiological studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Levels of Use of a GIS
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

