Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains
Published on: July 20, 2022
Importance of interplane coupling on the magnetic phases of quasi-two-dimensional tantalites
E G Santos1, J B M da Cunha, O Isnard
1Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, CP 15051, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Abstract:
We propose a three-dimensional model to describe magnetic interactions in a class of tantalite compounds of compositions A(x)A'(1-x)Ta(2)O(6), with A,A' = Fe, Co or Ni. Due to the quasi-two-dimensional nature of the magnetism in these compounds, experimental data have been previously interpreted using two-dimensional models. These are anisotropic Heisenberg models or Ising models and include competing exchange interactions from different neighbors. Taking into account all the relevant exchange terms, which include interplane interactions, we show that the latter allows us to understand the various low-temperature magnetic phases observed by neutron diffraction in this family of compounds. This is done by studying the eigenvalues of the exchange-interaction matrix in wavevector space for different sets of coupling parameters, of which those relative to in-plane interactions have been obtained from high-temperature series analysis of the magnetic susceptibility. This approach is rather general and the model presented here is directly applicable to isostructural compounds like ASb(2)O(6).
More Related Videos
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
08:55Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns