Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication01:30

Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication

Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...
Factors Influencing Attraction V: Social Skills01:29

Factors Influencing Attraction V: Social Skills

Social skills play a crucial role in shaping interpersonal interactions and enhancing individuals' ability to navigate various social environments successfully. These skills contribute to personal and professional success, influencing how others perceive and treat individuals. High social skills provide distinct advantages in numerous settings, including romantic relationships, politics, and legal proceedings. In courtroom settings, for instance, defendants who exhibit strong social skills are...
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group01:29

Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group

Interpersonal communication focuses on the exchange of messages between two people.
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
Barriers to Effective Communication II01:21

Barriers to Effective Communication II

The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Opsin gene evolution in aquatic, amphibious and terrestrial blennies (Blenniidae).

Biology open·2026
Same author

Spontaneous facial expressivity predicts real-world social network size and richness.

iScience·2026
Same author

Mechanistic constraint and evolutionary history matter for the origin of innovation in animal communication.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2026
Same author

The Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genomes of the Lined Rockskipper, Istiblennius lineatus (Teleostei: Blenniidae).

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

EVApeCognition: An 18-Year Dataset of Great Ape Cognition.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Tests of the Oddity Effect Hypothesis in mixed-species parid flocks.

PloS one·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges
07:18

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges

Published on: January 26, 2024

Social complexity as a proximate and ultimate factor in communicative complexity.

Todd M Freeberg1, Robin I M Dunbar, Terry J Ord

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. tfreeber@utk.edu

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|May 30, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The social complexity hypothesis suggests that intricate social structures drive the evolution of complex communication systems. This theory explores how social interactions shape communication, potentially influencing human language origins.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges
07:18

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges

Published on: January 26, 2024

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Animal Communication
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • The social complexity hypothesis links group social structure to communication system complexity.
  • Complex social systems involve frequent, varied interactions within networks.
  • Complex communication systems feature numerous distinct elements and high information content.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical arguments and evidence supporting the social complexity hypothesis.
  • To explore social complexity as a driver of communication evolution.
  • To discuss the hypothesis's role in understanding human language origins.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of arguments for the social complexity hypothesis.
  • Synthesis of existing evidence supporting the hypothesis.
  • Discussion of limitations and future research directions.

Main Results:

  • The study outlines the theoretical basis of the social complexity hypothesis.
  • Evidence supporting the link between social complexity and communication complexity is reviewed.
  • The hypothesis is presented as a potential factor in human language evolution.

Conclusions:

  • Social complexity is a significant factor influencing communication system development.
  • Further research is needed to test the hypothesis against alternatives and across different communication modalities.