Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:16

Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

Adrenergic agonists' structure-activity relationship (SAR) determines their selectivity and efficacy. These agonists comprise a phenylethylamine moiety with an aromatic ring and an ethylamine side chain.
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of the aromatic...
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype01:31

Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype

Adrenoceptors are classified into α and ꞵ classes based on their potencies to catecholamine agonists. α-adrenoceptors show the following order of catecholamine potency:
Adrenaline ≥ Noradrenaline >> Isoprenaline
α-adrenoceptors are further divided into α1 and α2-adrenoceptors.
α1-Adrenoceptors: These receptors are located postsynaptically on the effector organs and cause constriction of smooth muscle mediated by activation of phospholipase C—inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers01:17

Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers

Adrenergic antagonists, or sympatholytics, inhibit adrenoceptor activation driven by catecholamines or agonists. Based on their adrenoceptor specificity, adrenergic blockers can be categorized into two primary groups: α-adrenergic blockers (α-blockers) and β-adrenergic blockers (β-blockers). α-blockers interact with α1 and α2 subtypes of α-adrenoceptors.
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline moieties. Phenoxybenzamine, with a haloalkylamine...
Adrenergic Agonists: Direct-Acting Agents01:30

Adrenergic Agonists: Direct-Acting Agents

Drugs that mimic the action of endogenous catecholamines like noradrenaline and adrenaline are called adrenergic agonists or sympathomimetics. Based on their mechanism of action, sympathomimetics can be classified as direct-, indirect-, or mixed-acting sympathomimetics. Direct-acting adrenergic agonists activate adrenoceptors without affecting presynaptic neurons, making them independent of neuronal catecholamine-depleting agents like reserpine and guanethidine.
These agents can be classified...
The Two-State Receptor Model01:29

The Two-State Receptor Model

The two-state receptor model explains a drug's interaction with receptors, such as G protein-coupled receptors and ligand-gated ion channels, to induce or inhibit a biological response. When no natural ligands are present, a receptor exists in an equilibrium of inactive (Ri) and active (Ra) conformations. The inactive form does not produce a response, while the active form generates a basal effect known as constitutive activity.
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with one...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From dual norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibition to selective dopamine reuptake inhibitors: a case of aromatically substituted <i>N</i>,2-cyclopentylamines.

RSC medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2025/26: G protein-coupled receptors.

British journal of pharmacology·2025
Same author

Lithium prevents the neurotoxic effects of paclitaxel mediated through TRPA1 channels.

Molecular pain·2025
Same author

Navigating Solute Carrier Transporters-A Comprehensive Review of Functionalized Small Molecule Probes for Target Identification and Characterization.

Medicinal research reviews·2025
Same author

The solute carrier superfamily interactome.

Molecular systems biology·2025
Same author

Covalent functionalization of G protein-coupled receptors by small molecular probes.

RSC chemical biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells
14:02

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells

Published on: April 9, 2018

Multi-objective evolutionary design of adenosine receptor ligands.

Eelke van der Horst1, Patricia Marqués-Gallego, Thea Mulder-Krieger

  • 1Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|June 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary

A new evolutionary algorithm discovered novel adenosine receptor antagonists. This method rapidly generates and refines drug candidates with high affinity and selectivity, leading to promising compounds for further development.

More Related Videos

Determining the Serum Stability of Human Adenosine Deaminase 1 Enzyme
04:17

Determining the Serum Stability of Human Adenosine Deaminase 1 Enzyme

Published on: September 27, 2024

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells
14:02

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells

Published on: April 9, 2018

Determining the Serum Stability of Human Adenosine Deaminase 1 Enzyme
04:17

Determining the Serum Stability of Human Adenosine Deaminase 1 Enzyme

Published on: September 27, 2024

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Medicinal Chemistry
  • Computational Drug Design
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Adenosine receptors are crucial drug targets.
  • Developing selective antagonists with good ADMET properties remains challenging.
  • De novo drug design requires efficient computational methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a novel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) for de novo design of adenosine receptor antagonists.
  • To optimize compounds for high affinity, selectivity, and favorable ADMET properties.
  • To identify novel chemical scaffolds with potential therapeutic applications.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (Molecule Commander) for iterative structure generation, evaluation, and selection.
  • Employed a pharmacophore model for the human A1 adenosine receptor (hA1AR) as an objective function.
  • Developed support vector machine models for other adenosine receptor subtypes (hA2A, hA2B, hA3) to ensure selectivity.
  • Evaluated compounds based on predicted affinity, selectivity, and ADMET properties.

Main Results:

  • Generated a library of 3946 unique compounds, from which chemical scaffolds were derived.
  • Six selected scaffolds were synthesized and tested, with scaffolds 2 and 3 showing low micromolar affinity for adenosine receptor subtypes.
  • Systematic modifications on scaffold 3 led to improved affinity and selectivity for hA1AR; compound 3a showed 280 nM affinity with 10-fold selectivity, and compound 3g exhibited 1.6 μM affinity with negligible activity at other subtypes.

Conclusions:

  • The developed MOEA is effective for de novo design of adenosine receptor antagonists.
  • The identified scaffolds represent promising starting points for developing novel therapeutics targeting adenosine receptors.
  • The study demonstrates the power of evolutionary algorithms in accelerating drug discovery with desired pharmacological profiles.