Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimal Dosing Regimen for Epcoritamab, a Subcutaneous Bispecific Antibody, in Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025
Same author

Population Pharmacokinetics of Epcoritamab Following Subcutaneous Administration in Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Clinical pharmacokinetics·2024
Same author

Daratumumab Plus Atezolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC: Brief Report on a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 1b/2 Study (LUC2001 JNJ-54767414).

JTO clinical and research reports·2021
Same author

Daratumumab With Cetrelimab, an Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia·2021
Same author

Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: final results from the phase 2 GEN501 and SIRIUS trials.

The Lancet. Haematology·2020
Same author

Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, and Follicular Lymphoma.

Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia·2019
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Adaptive group sequential test with changing patient population.

Huaibao Feng1, Qing Liu

  • 1Clinical Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA. HFeng12@its.jnj.com

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|June 2, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standard group sequential tests assume consistent treatment effects. This study addresses violations caused by changing patient populations during trials, proposing a method to correct statistical analysis and ensure unbiased inference for heterogeneous treatment effects.

More Related Videos

The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
06:23

The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease

Published on: October 13, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
06:23

The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease

Published on: October 13, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Group sequential tests traditionally assume homogeneous treatment effects over time.
  • This assumption is often violated in clinical trials, especially when patient populations change during interim analyses.
  • Heterogeneous treatment effects can arise from relaxed inclusion/exclusion criteria, impacting trial validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the issue of inflated Type I error rates in group sequential trials with changing patient populations.
  • To develop a statistical method for unbiased inference when treatment effects vary across different patient cohorts.
  • To ensure the integrity of statistical analysis in adaptive clinical trial designs.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated scenarios where relaxed patient entry criteria at interim analyses lead to heterogeneous treatment effects.
  • Utilized linear regression models to analyze data from evolving patient populations.
  • Developed a method to make inference on the target population using all available data from changed populations.

Main Results:

  • Simulation results demonstrated severe inflation of Type I error rates when no statistical adjustment was made.
  • The proposed method, employing linear regression models, effectively corrects for population changes.
  • The statistical analysis based on the proposed method yields unbiased inference.

Conclusions:

  • Violations of the homogeneity assumption in group sequential trials necessitate statistical adjustments.
  • Linear regression models provide a robust framework for unbiased inference in adaptive trials with changing populations.
  • The proposed method ensures reliable conclusions despite evolving patient characteristics and treatment effects.