Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Executive processing differences between learning-disabled, mildly retarded, and normal achieving children.

H L Swanson1

  • 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
|October 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reading research for students with LD: a meta-analysis of intervention outcomes.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

Treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: how important are internal and external validity?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

Are mathematics disabilities due to a domain-general or a domain-specific working memory deficit?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A subgroup analysis of working memory in children with reading disabilities: domain-general or domain-specific deficiency?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same journal

A Prospective Study of Rumination and Irritability in Youth.

Journal of abnormal child psychology·2020
Same journal

Trajectories of Overprotective Parenting and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity and Inattention Among Moderate-Late Preterm Children: A Population-Based Study.

Journal of abnormal child psychology·2020
Same journal

Longitudinal Associations Linking Elementary and Middle School Contexts with Student Aggression in Early Adolescence.

Journal of abnormal child psychology·2020
Same journal

Unpacking Associations between Mood Symptoms and Screen Time in Preadolescents: a Network Analysis.

Journal of abnormal child psychology·2020
Same journal

Anxiety and Depressive Symptom Trajectories in Adolescence and the Co-Occurring Development of Cognitive Biases: Evidence from the CogBIAS Longitudinal Study.

Journal of abnormal child psychology·2020
Same journal

Developmental Trajectories of Adolescent Girls' Borderline Personality Symptoms and Sexual Risk Behaviors.

Journal of abnormal child psychology·2020
See all related articles

This study reveals distinct executive processing differences in children with mild intellectual disability and learning disabilities. Both groups struggle with secondary word recall under high cognitive effort, indicating unique resource management challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Neuropsychology

Background:

  • Executive processing is crucial for cognitive functions like memory and attention.
  • Understanding executive processing differences in children with intellectual disabilities and learning disabilities is vital for targeted interventions.
  • Previous research has explored cognitive deficits in these populations, but executive processing nuances require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare executive processing capabilities in mildly retarded, learning-disabled, and normal achieving children.
  • To investigate differences in recalling central and secondary words under varying encoding efforts.
  • To infer executive processing efficiency from recall performance and resource management strategies.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Children from three groups (mildly retarded, learning-disabled, normal achieving) participated.
  • Participants recalled central and secondary words from base and elaborative sentences.
  • Recall performance was assessed under high and low encoding effort conditions.

Main Results:

  • All groups showed comparable recall for central words.
  • Significant differences in secondary word recall emerged under high-effort encoding.
  • Qualitative differences in resource prioritization and information transfer monitoring were observed between groups.

Conclusions:

  • Mildly retarded children exhibit inefficiencies in sharing cognitive resources.
  • Learning-disabled children demonstrate inefficiencies in discriminating cognitive resources.
  • These findings support an executive processing framework highlighting distinct resource management deficits in these developmental conditions.