Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Induction and Diagnosis of Tumors in Drosophila Imaginal Disc Epithelia
Published on: July 25, 2017
Making sense of downward causation in manipulationism: illustrations from cancer research
1Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et Techniques, 13 rue du Four, 75006 Paris, France.
Abstract:
Many researchers consider cancer to have molecular causes, namely mutated genes that result in abnormal cell proliferation (e.g. Weinberg 1998). For others, the causes of cancer are to be found not at the molecular level but at the tissue level where carcinogenesis consists of disrupted tissue organization with downward causation effects on cells and cellular components (e.g. Sonnenschein and Soto 2008). In this contribution, I ponder how to make sense of such downward causation claims. Adopting a manipulationist account of causation (Woodward 2003), I propose a formal definition of downward causation and discuss further requirements (in light of Baumgartner 2009). I then show that such an account cannot be mobilized in support of non-reductive physicalism (contrary to Raatikainen 2010). However, I also argue that such downward causation claims might point at particularly interesting dynamic properties of causal relationships that might prove salient in characterizing causal relationships (following Woodward 2010).
Insights
Cancer causation is debated: molecular vs. tissue-level factors. This study formally defines downward causation, exploring its implications for understanding cancer development and causal relationships.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Science
- Cancer Biology
- Causation Theory
Background:
- Cancer causation is debated, with some researchers focusing on molecular causes like gene mutations and others on tissue-level disruptions.
- The concept of "downward causation" from tissue organization to cellular processes is a key point of contention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To formally define downward causation using a manipulationist account.
- To explore the implications of downward causation for cancer research and causal relationship characterization.
Main Methods:
- Adoption of a manipulationist account of causation (Woodward 2003).
- Formal definition of downward causation and discussion of requirements (Baumgartner 2009).
- Analysis of the compatibility of downward causation with non-reductive physicalism (Raatikainen 2010).
Main Results:
- A formal definition of downward causation is proposed.
- The proposed account does not support non-reductive physicalism.
- Downward causation claims may highlight important dynamic properties of causal relationships.
Conclusions:
- Downward causation can be formally defined within a manipulationist framework.
- This framework challenges certain philosophical positions on physicalism.
- Investigating downward causation offers insights into the complex nature of causal mechanisms in biological systems, including cancer.
More Related Videos
07:23A Protocol for Genetic Induction and Visualization of Benign and Invasive Tumors in Cephalic Complexes of Drosophila melanogaster
Published on: September 11, 2013
05:17Micromanipulation of Circulating Tumor Cells for Downstream Molecular Analysis and Metastatic Potential Assessment
Published on: May 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
What is Cancer?
Although people have known about cancer for centuries, it was only in 1761 that Giovanni Morgagni of Padua performed a detailed autopsy of patients who died from...
Causality in Epidemiology
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Cause and Effect
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...