Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: September 2, 2016
General formulation of spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory using non-collinear kernels: theory,
Yves A Bernard1, Yihan Shao, Anna I Krylov
1Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0482, USA.
We implemented spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory (SF-TDDFT) with various functionals to calculate energy gaps. The PBE family, especially PBE50, showed excellent accuracy for diradicals and open-shell atoms.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
Background:
- Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) is crucial for excited-state calculations.
- Spin-flip (SF) variants of TD-DFT are used for open-shell systems.
- Evaluating functional performance is key for accurate predictions.
Purpose of the Study:
- Implement and evaluate spin-flip (SF) TD-DFT with non-collinear (NC) formalism.
- Assess performance across various functionals (local, GGA, hybrid, range-separated).
- Benchmark accuracy using energy gaps of diradicals and open-shell atoms.
Main Methods:
- Implemented SF-TDDFT within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation and NC formalism.
- Utilized local, generalized gradient approximation (GGA), hybrid, and range-separated functionals.
- Performed benchmark calculations on 41 energy gaps for diradicals and open-shell atoms.
Main Results:
- The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) family, particularly PBE0 and PBE50, demonstrated consistent high accuracy.
- PBE50 achieved a mean average deviation of 0.090 eV.
- Collinear SF-TDDFT with PBE50 did not enhance accuracy compared to NC variants.
Conclusions:
- PBE-based functionals, especially PBE50, are highly recommended for SF-TDDFT calculations of energy gaps.
- NC-SF-TDDFT and collinear SF-TDDFT show similar accuracy with specific functionals.
- Care must be taken with functionals like LYP or B97 for same-center diradicals due to large errors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

