Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
Reducing error and improving efficiency during vascular interventional radiology: implementation of a preprocedural
Abigail H M Morbi1, Mohamad S Hamady, Celia V Riga
1Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, England.
Purpose:
To determine the type and frequency of errors during vascular interventional radiology (VIR) and design and implement an intervention to reduce error and improve efficiency in this setting.
Materials And Methods:
Ethical guidance was sought from the Research Services Department at Imperial College London. Informed consent was not obtained. Field notes were recorded during 55 VIR procedures by a single observer. Two blinded assessors identified failures from field notes and categorized them into one or more errors by using a 22-part classification system. The potential to cause harm, disruption to procedural flow, and preventability of each failure was determined. A preprocedural team rehearsal (PPTR) was then designed and implemented to target frequent preventable potential failures. Thirty-three procedures were observed subsequently to determine the efficacy of the PPTR. Nonparametric statistical analysis was used to determine the effect of intervention on potential failure rates, potential to cause harm and procedural flow disruption scores (Mann-Whitney U test), and number of preventable failures (Fisher exact test).
Results:
Before intervention, 1197 potential failures were recorded, of which 54.6% were preventable. A total of 2040 errors were deemed to have occurred to produce these failures. Planning error (19.7%), staff absence (16.2%), equipment unavailability (12.2%), communication error (11.2%), and lack of safety consciousness (6.1%) were the most frequent errors, accounting for 65.4% of the total. After intervention, 352 potential failures were recorded. Classification resulted in 477 errors. Preventable failures decreased from 54.6% to 27.3% (P < .001) with implementation of PPTR. Potential failure rates per hour decreased from 18.8 to 9.2 (P < .001), with no increase in potential to cause harm or procedural flow disruption per failure.
Conclusion:
Failures during VIR procedures are largely because of ineffective planning, communication error, and equipment difficulties, rather than a result of technical or patient-related issues. Many of these potential failures are preventable. A PPTR is an effective means of targeting frequent preventable failures, reducing procedural delays and improving patient safety.
Insights
Vascular interventional radiology (VIR) procedures had frequent preventable errors due to planning and communication issues. A preprocedural team rehearsal (PPTR) significantly reduced these errors, improving efficiency and patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Interventional Radiology
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Vascular interventional radiology (VIR) procedures are complex and prone to errors.
- Identifying and categorizing errors is crucial for improving patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the types and frequency of errors in VIR procedures.
- To design and implement an intervention to reduce errors and enhance efficiency.
Main Methods:
- 55 VIR procedures were observed, and failures were categorized using a 22-part classification system.
- A preprocedural team rehearsal (PPTR) was developed to address frequent, preventable failures.
- 33 procedures were observed post-intervention to assess PPTR efficacy using nonparametric statistical analysis.
Main Results:
- Before intervention, 1197 potential failures occurred, with 54.6% being preventable. Common errors included planning, staff absence, and equipment unavailability.
- After PPTR implementation, potential failures decreased to 352, with preventable failures dropping to 27.3% (P < .001).
- Potential failure rates per hour significantly reduced from 18.8 to 9.2 (P < .001) without increasing harm or workflow disruption.
Conclusions:
- VIR procedural failures often stem from non-technical issues like planning and communication, which are largely preventable.
- A preprocedural team rehearsal (PPTR) effectively targets and reduces frequent, preventable errors in VIR.
- Implementing PPTR improves efficiency by reducing procedural delays and enhances overall patient safety.
More Related Videos
06:18Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality
Published on: April 5, 2024
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT