Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Multifocal Electroretinograms
16:49

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

Reproducibility of multifocal VEP latency using different stimulus presentations.

Prema Sriram1, Alexander Klistorner, Hemamalini Arvind

  • 1Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Hub 1, Building F10A, 2 Technology Place, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. premasriram@gmail.com

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|June 7, 2012
PubMed
Summary

The first peak of multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) shows the most reproducible latency. Pattern reversal stimulation offers less latency variability compared to pattern pulse, crucial for reliable mfVEP testing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies on chronic lesion tissue expansion.

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)·2026
Same author

Invisible threats of microplastics induced toxicity: Oxidative and inflammatory pathways in the CNS and retina.

International review of neurobiology·2026
Same author

Proposing the Learning Ultrasound in Critical Care Framework for a Longitudinal Competence Program for Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Critical Care-A Modified Delphi Survey.

Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine·2026
Same author

Narrative Review on History of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training in Critical Care.

Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine·2026
Same author

Synergistic retinal UCHL1 dysregulation and synaptic vulnerability reflect Alzheimer's disease severity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Identification of Chlamydia pneumoniae and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in Alzheimer's disease retina.

Nature communications·2026

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is a key diagnostic tool.
  • Assessing the reproducibility of mfVEP latency is essential for clinical reliability.
  • Variability in mfVEP recordings can impact diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reproducibility of mfVEP latency across different stimulus presentations.
  • To determine which latency measure (start of response, first peak, second peak) exhibits the least variability.
  • To compare the reproducibility between pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulus methods.

Main Methods:

  • mfVEP was recorded in 10 healthy subjects using both pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimuli.
  • Testing was repeated within 1-2 weeks to assess inter-session reproducibility.

More Related Videos

Visual Evoked Potential Recording in a Rat Model of Experimental Optic Nerve Demyelination
06:49

Visual Evoked Potential Recording in a Rat Model of Experimental Optic Nerve Demyelination

Published on: July 29, 2015

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Multifocal Electroretinograms
16:49

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

Visual Evoked Potential Recording in a Rat Model of Experimental Optic Nerve Demyelination
06:49

Visual Evoked Potential Recording in a Rat Model of Experimental Optic Nerve Demyelination

Published on: July 29, 2015

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

  • Latencies were analyzed for the start of the response, first peak, and second peak, excluding segments with low signal-to-noise ratio (<1.5).

    • Main Results:

    • mfVEP waveforms demonstrated good reproducibility across the visual field.
    • Latency reproducibility was significantly lower at the start of the response compared to the first and second peaks.
    • The first peak showed no statistically significant difference in reproducibility compared to the second peak.
    • Pattern reversal stimulation resulted in less latency variability than pattern pulse stimulation.
    • Latency values were consistent between the two testing sessions for all peaks and stimulus types.

    Conclusions:

    • The first peak of the mfVEP response is the most reproducible measure for latency.
    • Pattern reversal stimulation provides more reliable mfVEP latency measurements than pattern pulse stimulation.
    • These findings support the use of the first peak and pattern reversal stimuli for enhanced diagnostic accuracy in mfVEP testing.