Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Using eye-tracking technology for communication in Rett syndrome: perceptions of impact.

Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)·2018

Same author

Solution-focused coaching in pediatric rehabilitation: an integrated model for practice.

Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics·2013

Same author

Do drug treatment POEMs report data in clinically useful ways?

The Journal of family practice·2013

Same author

Communication access in the library for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication.

Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)·2008

Same author

AAC and community partnerships: the participation path to community inclusion.

Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)·2006

Same author

Computer-Based Language Assessment Software: The Effects of Presentation and Response Format.

Language, speech, and hearing services in schools·1999

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

Traditional versus computerized presentation and response methods on a structured AAC assessment tool.

Stacy McDougall¹, Kelli Vessoyan, Brent Duncan

¹Autism Program, Thames Valley Children's Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. stacy.mcdougall@tvcc.on.ca

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)

|June 8, 2012

Summary

This study found no significant difference in performance on the Test of Aided-Symbol Performance™ (TASP) between traditional and computerized methods for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) users. Computerized methods could broaden access to this important AAC assessment tool.

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
Human-Computer Interaction
Speech and Language Pathology

Background:

The Test of Aided-Symbol Performance™ (TASP) is a key tool for evaluating augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) users.
Traditional administration methods may limit the accessibility and broader application of the TASP.
Investigating computerized alternatives is crucial for modernizing AAC assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare participant performance on a TASP subtest using traditional versus computerized presentation and response methods.
To determine if computerized methods offer a viable alternative for TASP administration.
To assess the potential for increased accessibility of the TASP through technology.

Main Methods:

A within-subject crossover design was employed.
Participants (aged 6-21) using AAC were randomly assigned to experience both traditional and computerized TASP administration conditions, separated by two months.
Performance on a TASP subtest was measured in both conditions.

Main Results:

No statistically significant difference in participant performance was observed between the traditional and computerized administration conditions.
The findings support the hypothesis that computerized methods are equivalent to traditional methods for this TASP subtest.
Participant age and AAC use did not significantly impact the observed performance equivalence.

Conclusions:

Computerized presentation and response methods are a valid alternative for administering the TASP.
Adoption of computerized methods can enhance the broader usability and accessibility of the TASP.
This facilitates more confident evaluation of AAC options for individuals requiring communication support.