Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative prediction of oil-water interfacial tension in surfactant systems using dissipative particle dynamics.

Soft matterยท2026
Same author

Assessment and Optimization of Force Fields for Glycine Polymorphism and Solution Properties.

Journal of chemical theory and computationยท2026
Same author

Clusterin reverses epitheliopathy, reduces inflammation, and restores goblet cells and corneal nerves in a mouse model of autoimmune dry eye.

Scientific reportsยท2026
Same author

Clusterin: A clinical translation spearhead for extracellular chaperones that promotes neural regeneration.

Neural regeneration researchยท2026
Same author

Revisiting reliability with human and machine learning raters under scoring design and rater configuration in the many-facet Rasch model.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychologyยท2026
Same author

An examination of the cognitive and affective processes in errorless motor learning: study protocol.

Frontiers in psychologyยท2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality
06:18

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2024

Cutting errors in surgery: experience limits underestimation bias in a simulated surgical environment.

Neha Malhotra1, Jamie M Poolton, Mark R Wilson

  • 1Institute of Human Performance, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. nehamal@hku.hk

Journal of Surgical Education
|June 9, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Surgical novices, unlike experienced surgeons, show increased errors in estimating incision length in visually challenging laparoscopic tasks, especially without visual feedback. Experience mitigates perceptual biases in surgical simulations.

More Related Videos

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality
06:18

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2024

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Surgical simulation
  • Human factors in surgery
  • Visual perception in medicine

Background:

  • Effective error management is critical for surgical training and patient safety.
  • Laparoscopic surgery presents unique visual challenges that may increase perceptual errors.
  • Understanding how surgical experience influences error management in simulated environments is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare error management strategies between surgical novices and experienced surgeons.
  • To investigate performance in a simulated incision task within a visually demanding laparoscopic setting.
  • To assess the impact of visual feedback and perceptual illusions on error tendencies.

Main Methods:

  • Novice and experienced surgeons performed simulated incisions on a laparoscopic monitor, replicating line lengths.
  • The task was conducted with and without visual feedback of the operating hand.
  • A perceptual illusion (Ponzo illusion) was introduced to further challenge visual perception.

Main Results:

  • All participants underestimated incision lengths; novices showed a significantly greater underestimation bias without visual feedback.
  • Experienced surgeons' performance was unaffected by the lack of visual feedback.
  • Novices were significantly influenced by the perceptual illusion, while experienced surgeons were not.

Conclusions:

  • A bias towards underestimating incision length exists in laparoscopic surgery, potentially exacerbated by visual challenges.
  • Surgical experience appears to mitigate this underestimation bias, particularly in visually complex scenarios.
  • Findings support the application of error management theory to surgical training and simulation.