Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conspiracy beliefs and perceptual inference in times of political uncertainty.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Functional connectivity and glutamate levels of the medial prefrontal cortex in schizotypy are related to sensory amplification in a probabilistic reasoning task.

NeuroImage·2023
Same author

From hallucinations to synaesthesia: A circular inference account of unimodal and multimodal erroneous percepts in clinical and drug-induced psychosis.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2022
Same author

No increased circular inference in adults with high levels of autistic traits or autism.

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same author

Efficient and robust coding in heterogeneous recurrent networks.

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same author

Predictive learning as a network mechanism for extracting low-dimensional latent space representations.

Nature communications·2021
Same journal

Synaptic micromechanics and brain softening as a mechanobiological hypothesis for Alzheimer's disease.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

The relationship between healthy sleep patterns and the risk of scoliosis: a large prospective cohort study.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Dynamic functional reorganization in post-stroke aphasia: a state-of-the-art fMRI review from disease evolution to intervention.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: Case Report: A possible novel adult-onset, progressive MAO-A hypofunction.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Respiratory modulation of neurophysiology and symptoms in athletes with sports-related concussion: a randomized crossover trial.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Impact of C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose and systemic immune-inflammation indices on obstructive sleep apnea in older adults with depression.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability.

Sophie Deneve1

  • 1Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Group for Neural Theory, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris, France.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|June 9, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a Bayesian decision model for faster, more accurate choices by simultaneously estimating sensory reliability and choice probabilities. The model dynamically adjusts decision thresholds and sensory input weighting for improved decision-making accuracy and speed.

Keywords:
Bayesianadaptationdecision makingdecision thresholdevidenceexpectation-maximizationprioruncertainty

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Accurate decision-making requires integrating sensory input, prior knowledge, and adjusting criteria.
  • Standard diffusion models for decision-making face a challenge in determining optimal integration speed and thresholds without knowing sensory reliability beforehand.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a Bayesian decision model that simultaneously infers choice probabilities and estimates sensory information reliability within a single trial.
  • To create a non-linear diffusion to bound model with dynamically changing sensory input weights and decision thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bayesian decision framework to model simultaneous inference of choice probabilities and sensory reliability.
  • Developed a non-linear diffusion to bound model based on noisy sensory spiking neuron responses.
  • Investigated model performance in a motion discrimination task.

Main Results:

  • The model demonstrates dynamic adjustments in sensory input weighting and decision thresholds, adapting to trial difficulty.
  • Difficult trials show faster, less accurate decisions due to collapsing thresholds and strong early sensory impact.
  • Easy trials result in slower, more accurate decisions with increasing sensory weight and thresholds over time.

Conclusions:

  • The adaptive sensory weights in this model provide accurate choice probability representations, superior to standard diffusion models.
  • This model can integrate unreliable cues, like priors, effectively.
  • The model accounts for empirical findings in motion discrimination and is implementable via Hebbian learning in neural architectures.