Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

08:07
A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
Published on: January 11, 2018
Geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular shape diversity in Pan
1Department of Biology, Bronx Community College, City University of New York, 2155 University Avenue, Bronx, NY 10453, USA. chris.robinson@bcc.cuny.edu
Journal of Human Evolution
|June 12, 2012
Summary
Geometric morphometrics (GM) reveal significant mandibular shape differences between bonobos and chimpanzees, with the mandibular symphysis being key for species identification. These findings aid understanding of hominin evolution and fossil analysis.
Area of Science:
- Paleoanthropology
- Comparative Anatomy
- Biomechanics
Background:
- The mandibular corpus is frequently found in the hominin fossil record.
- Previous studies have not deeply explored 3D mandibular corpus shape differences between adult bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) using geometric morphometrics (GM).
- GM offers quantitative analysis and visualization of 3D skeletal shape changes, complementing traditional 2D methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if GM techniques can differentiate mandibular corpus shape between bonobos and chimpanzees.
- To explore the implications of these shape differences for understanding hominin evolution.
- To assess the utility of mandibular shape for taxonomic analyses of fossil hominoids.
Main Methods:
- Collected 18 mandibular landmarks from adult bonobos and chimpanzees using a Microscribe 3DX digitizer.
- Applied Generalized Procrustes analysis for landmark superimposition and multivariate statistics for shape analysis.
- Analyzed size-adjusted shapes and residuals from regression on centroid size.
Main Results:
- Size-adjusted mandibular corpus shapes distinguished bonobos and chimpanzees with ~93% accuracy.
- Significant Procrustes distances were found between the two species.
- Shape differences were largely size-related, but the mandibular symphysis proved particularly useful for differentiating Pan species.
- Chimpanzee subspecies and Australopithecus specimens showed lower identification accuracy (≤75%).
Conclusions:
- Geometric morphometrics effectively distinguish bonobo and chimpanzee mandibular corpus shapes.
- The mandibular symphysis is a key region for taxonomic identification in fossil hominoids.
- These findings have implications for hominoid phylogeny and the interpretation of fossil hominin mandibles.

