Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

In Vitro ELISA Test to Evaluate Rabies Vaccine Potency
Published on: May 11, 2020
Comparison of RFFIT tests with different standard sera and testing procedures
Peng-cheng Yu1, Akira Noguchi, Satoshi Inoue
1State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
The rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) shows consistent rabies antibody detection between Japanese and Chinese labs. However, using a locally standardized serum resulted in higher antibody titers compared to the WHO standard serum.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Virology
- Public Health
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) uses the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) to measure rabies antibody levels, indicating immunity post-vaccination.
- Standardized antibody testing is crucial for assessing vaccine efficacy and public health preparedness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare RFFIT results between the National Institute of Infectious Disease (NIID) in Japan and the Chinese Centre for Disease Control (CCDC).
- To evaluate the influence of different standard sera on RFFIT outcomes.
- To assess the consistency of RFFIT methodology across international laboratories.
Main Methods:
- Simultaneous RFFIT analysis was performed by both NIID and CCDC laboratories.
- Four serum samples (C1, S1, S2, S4) were tested in parallel using NIID's reference serum and the WHO standard serum.
- Neutralizing antibody titers were calculated using the standard formula.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in the RFFIT methods employed by the NIID and CCDC, indicating good procedural consistency.
- Testing with NIID's tentative internal standard serum (TI-STD), adjusted to 2.0 IU of WHO standard serum, yielded higher antibody titers compared to using the WHO standard serum directly.
- The discrepancy in titers between the TI-STD and WHO standard serum suggests a potential variability in antibody quantification.
Conclusions:
- The RFFIT assay demonstrates reliable consistency between the NIID and CCDC laboratories for rabies antibody detection.
- A significant difference in detected antibody titers was observed when using a locally prepared standard serum versus the international WHO standard serum.
- Further investigation is warranted to understand the reasons for titer variations and to ensure accurate international comparability of rabies antibody measurements.
More Related Videos
07:25In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
04:50Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
Published on: August 4, 2023