Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Assessment of Respiratory Function in Conscious Mice by Double-chamber Plethysmography
Published on: July 10, 2018
Relationship of mannitol challenge to methacholine challenge and inflammatory markers in persistent asthmatics
William J Anderson1, Brian J Lipworth
1Division of Medical Sciences, Centre for Cardiovascular and Lung Biology, Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK. drwjanderson@gmail.com
Background:
Mannitol is a novel osmotic indirect bronchial challenge agent used to aid asthma diagnosis and management and is thought to reflect underlying inflammatory processes in asthma. Our objective was to evaluate relationships between mannitol airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and other measures of airway inflammation as well as direct-acting methacholine challenge in persistent asthmatics receiving inhaled corticosteroids.
Methods:
We analysed screening data of mild to moderate persistent asthmatics, all receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), who had mannitol and/or methacholine challenges, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and salivary eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) performed as part of the same screen. Mannitol AHR was grouped by PD(10) (cumulative provocative dose required to produce a 10 % fall in FEV(1)): mild (315-635 mg), moderate (75-315 mg), and severe (0-75 mg). FeNO groups were low (<25 ppb), medium (25-50 ppb), and high (> 50 ppb) and methacholine PC(20) (provocative concentration of methacholine required to cause a 20 % fall in FEV(1)) groups were mild (2-8 mg/ml), moderate (0.5-2 mg/ml), and severe (0-0.5 mg/ml).
Results:
Mannitol PD(10) groups were significantly different overall for FeNO (p = 0.023): 43 % higher in the severe vs. the mild group. There was a significant overall difference for methacholine PC(20) (p = 0.006): a 2.1 doubling dilution difference between severe vs. mild mannitol groups. FeNO groups were significantly different overall for mannitol PD(10) (p = 0.01) and methacholine PC(20) (p = 0.029). Methacholine PC(20) groups were significantly different overall for mannitol PD(10) (p < 0.001) and FeNO (p = 0.005). No significant differences were found across any groups for salivary ECP, FEV(1) % predicted, or ICS dose. Mannitol PD(10), methacholine PC(20), and FeNO as continuous variables all correlated with each other.
Conclusions:
Mannitol challenge reflects underlying inflammation using FeNO and direct AHR using methacholine. Thus, mannitol may be a useful screening tool for the assessment of asthmatic patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids.
Related Concept Videos
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Antiasthma Drugs: Inhaled Corticosteroids and Glucocorticoids
ICS work through a multifaceted mechanism of action. They suppress the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of TH cells. They also reduce the transcription of the IL-2 gene, which is involved in the...
Asthma I: Introduction
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease III: Chronic Bronchitis Features

