Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Rules for Significant Figures01:44

Rules for Significant Figures

In any measurement, the precision of the measuring tool is an essential factor. An ordinary ruler, for example, can measure length to the closest millimeter; a caliper, on the other hand, can measure length to the nearest 0.01 mm. As a result, the caliper is a more precise measurement tool because it can measure extremely minute changes in length. The measurements will be more accurate if the measuring tool is more precise.
It should be emphasized that when we represent measured values, the...
Precipitate Formation and Particle Size Control01:16

Precipitate Formation and Particle Size Control

In precipitation gravimetry, the precipitating agent should react specifically or selectively with the analyte. While a specific reagent reacts with the analyte alone, a selective reagent can react with a limited number of chemical species.
The obtained precipitate should be either a pure substance of known composition or easily converted to one by a simple process, such as ignition or drying. In addition, the precipitate should be insoluble and easily filterable. In general, filterability...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distilling noise characteristics and prior expectations in multisensory causal inference.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Field reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised among life-sentenced prisoners in Sweden: A follow-up study.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same author

Clarifying the conceptual dimensions of representation in neuroscience.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same author

A megastudy of behavioral interventions to catalyze public, political, and financial climate advocacy.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Dynamics of working memory drift and information flow across the cortical hierarchy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Introducing the kollaR package: A user-friendly open-access solution for eye-tracking analysis and visualization.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

Does precision decrease with set size?

Helga Mazyar1, Ronald van den Berg, Wei Ji Ma

  • 1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Journal of Vision
|June 12, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual encoding precision decreases with more items when distractors are varied, not when they are similar. This finding highlights stimulus heterogeneity as key, not memory load, in visual perception.

More Related Videos

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement
11:38

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement

Published on: January 17, 2015

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
09:10

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement
11:38

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement

Published on: January 17, 2015

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
09:10

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Information Encoding

Background:

  • The brain's visual encoding precision is limited.
  • Existing research presents conflicting findings on whether encoding precision depends on the number of stimuli (set size).
  • Previous studies differed in stimulus homogeneity and memory task requirements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of stimulus heterogeneity and short-term memory on visual encoding precision.
  • To differentiate the roles of stimulus heterogeneity versus memory involvement in visual precision.
  • To compare optimal-observer models with constant versus set-size-dependent precision.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted two experiments manipulating stimulus heterogeneity and memory conditions.
  • Experiment 1: Heterogeneous stimuli, comparing pre- and post-display identity reveal.
  • Experiment 2: Fixed target identity, comparing heterogeneous and homogeneous distractors.
  • Utilized optimal-observer models to analyze precision changes with set size.

Main Results:

  • Visual encoding precision decreases with increased set size specifically when distractors are heterogeneous.
  • Precision remained constant with set size for homogeneous distractors, irrespective of memory involvement.
  • Stimulus heterogeneity, not short-term memory, was identified as the critical factor influencing precision.
  • Observed item and trial variability in precision, potentially linked to attentional fluctuations.

Conclusions:

  • Stimulus heterogeneity is the primary driver of reduced visual encoding precision at larger set sizes.
  • Short-term memory involvement does not critically affect precision when distractors are homogeneous.
  • Attentional fluctuations may contribute to variability in visual encoding precision.