Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Hearing impairment and self-masking: listening during vocalization
Erik Borg1, Carina Wikström, Dan Gustafsson
1Audiologic Research Centre, University Hospital of Örebro, Örebro, Sweden. Erik.borg@orebroll.se
Vocalizing [a:] significantly impacts speech perception for individuals with hearing impairment (HI), especially high-frequency loss. Understanding these masking effects is crucial for effective auditory rehabilitation and hearing aid design.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Speech Science
- Hearing Science
Background:
- Self-produced vocalizations can interfere with auditory perception.
- Understanding the masking effect of speech sounds is essential for individuals with hearing impairment (HI).
- Previous research has not fully elucidated the impact of vocalization on masking in HI populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the masking effect of a vocalized [a:] sound on noise bands and speech.
- To compare these masking effects in individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing impairment (HI) versus normal-hearing (NH) individuals.
- To assess the influence of different hearing loss configurations (high-frequency loss vs. low/mid-frequency loss) on masking.
Main Methods:
- Determined masked thresholds for noise bands (250-8000 Hz) and continuous discourse.
- Measured the amount of masking produced by the vocalized [a:].
- Identified the maximal vocalization level allowing subjects to follow continuous discourse.
Main Results:
- The vocalized [a:] produced significantly higher masked thresholds in subjects with high-frequency (HF) loss compared to normal-hearing (NH) subjects.
- Masking thresholds were also higher for HF loss subjects than for low-, mid-frequency (LMF) loss subjects.
- The overall amount of masking produced was significantly smaller in subjects with HI compared to NH subjects.
Conclusions:
- The masking effects of self-produced sounds, like vocalizations, are significant and must be considered in auditory rehabilitation strategies.
- These findings have implications for the future design of hearing aids to better accommodate the auditory environment of individuals with hearing impairment.
- Tailoring auditory rehabilitation and device design to account for vocalization-induced masking can improve speech understanding in HI individuals.
More Related Videos
05:48Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
11:15fMRI Mapping of Brain Activity Associated with the Vocal Production of Consonant and Dissonant Intervals
Published on: May 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Hearing
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...
Nonconscious Mimicry
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping