Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Representation of time.

J Gibbon1, R M Church

  • 1Department of Biopsychology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY 10032.

Cognition
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated time memory using scalar timing principles. Findings suggest time memory variance influences decisions but doesn't allow multiple memory accesses per trial.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mr. Gibbon's Case of Ann Foulkes.

The Medical and physical journal·2018
Same author

Are separate theories of conditioning and timing necessary?

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Dynamics of time matching: Arousal makes better seem worse.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Modality and intermittency effects on time estimation.

Behavioural processes·2009
Same author

Temporal landmarks: proximity prevails.

Animal cognition·2003
Same author

Event-related brain potentials isolate the motor component in a tapping task.

Neuroreport·2001
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Behavioral neuroscience
  • Animal cognition

Background:

  • Understanding the neural and cognitive mechanisms of time perception is crucial for explaining complex behaviors.
  • Scalar timing theory provides a framework for understanding how animals and humans represent and process temporal intervals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the properties of memory representation for time.
  • To determine if scalar timing principles apply to departure time decisions in a foraging analog.
  • To examine the role of scalar variance in memory and decision-making processes within the Peak procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of departure times from a patchy resource in a laboratory foraging analog.
  • Trial-by-trial analysis using the Peak procedure, a structured experimental paradigm for studying timing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Study of covariance structures to infer properties of memory and decision processes.
  • Main Results:

    • Departure times from a patchy resource exhibited a Weber Law-like property, consistent with scalar timing.
    • Covariance analysis implicated scalar variance in both time memory and decision-making.
    • Correlation patterns ruled out the possibility of multiple memory accesses within a single trial.

    Conclusions:

    • Scalar timing principles appear to govern temporal memory and decision-making in foraging-related tasks.
    • Scalar variance is a key component in the representation of time and the execution of timed responses.
    • The memory system for time operates in a manner that prevents simultaneous access within a trial.