Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Primary prevention of lead exposure--blood lead results at age two years
Carla Campbell1, Edward Gracely, Mary Tran
1School of Public Health, Drexel University, 1505 Race Street, MS 1034, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA. ccc57@drexel.edu
Insights
The Philadelphia Lead Safe Homes study found no significant difference in blood lead levels (BLLs) between children receiving lead exposure prevention interventions and those receiving standard care. However, interventions improved parental knowledge and reduced lead dust in homes.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Pediatric Health
- Public Health Interventions
Background:
- Childhood lead exposure remains a significant public health concern, particularly in urban environments.
- Early life interventions are crucial for preventing lead poisoning and its long-term health consequences.
- The Philadelphia Lead Safe Homes (LSH) Study aimed to assess the efficacy of targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if educational and environmental interventions in the first year of life increase knowledge of lead exposure prevention.
- To determine if these interventions are associated with lower blood lead levels (BLLs) in children compared to standard care.
- To assess the impact of interventions on parental knowledge and in-home environmental lead levels.
Main Methods:
- The study compared a cohort receiving educational and environmental interventions with a control group receiving standard care.
- Second-year blood lead level (BLL) data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and unpaired t-tests.
- Data included BLL results, age at draw, and percentages of children with BLLs above critical thresholds (≥5, ≥10, ≥20 µg/dL).
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were found in geometric mean BLLs between the intervention and control groups (3.7 vs. 3.5 µg/dL).
- Percentages of children with BLLs ≥5, ≥10, and ≥20 µg/dL were not significantly different between the groups.
- The interventions did lead to increased parental knowledge of lead prevention and reduced in-home lead dust levels.
Conclusions:
- While interventions did not significantly lower BLLs at age two, they positively impacted parental knowledge and home environments.
- Observed lower lead levels in both groups compared to historical data may indicate a general downward trend in U.S. children's BLLs.
- Further research may be needed to optimize intervention strategies for reducing childhood lead exposure effectively.
Objectives:
The Philadelphia Lead Safe Homes (LSH) Study was designed to evaluate whether educational and environmental interventions in the first year of life for families of newborns increased knowledge of lead exposure prevention and were associated with less elevation of blood lead levels (BLLs) for these children, when compared to children receiving standard care.
Methods:
The current study performed descriptive statistics on the second-year BLL data for both groups and compared these using chi-square tests for proportions and unpaired t-tests for means.
Results:
A BLL result was found for 159 (50.6%) of the 314 LSH cohort children and 331 (52.7%) of the 628 control children (p = 0.1). Mean and standard deviation for age at draw was 23.8 (3.4) months versus 23.6 (3.1) months (P = 0.6). Geometric mean BLLs were 3.7 versus 3.5 µg/dL (P = 0.4). The percentages of the cohort group with a BLL of ≥ 20, ≥ 10 and ≥ 5 μg/dL, respectively, were 0.6%, 5% and 30%; for the controls 1.2%, 6.6%, and 25%. These percentages were not significantly different between groups.
Conclusion:
A comparison of geometric mean BLLs and percentages above several BLL cut points drawn at age two years in a group of urban newborns benefitting from study interventions versus a group of similar urban children did not yield statistically significant differences. Both groups had relatively lower lead levels when compared to historical cohort groups, which may reflect a continuing downward trend in BLLs in U.S. children. The interventions did result in benefits to the families such as an increase in parental knowledge about lead exposure prevention and in-home wet cleaning activity, and a decrease in lead dust levels in study homes.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
