Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Case of a strong antiferromagnetic exchange coupling induced by spin polarization of a Mn-Mn partial single bond
Hélène Bolvin1, Frank R Wagner
1Laboratoire de Chimie et de Physique Quantiques, IRSAMC, Université de Toulouse III, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cédex 04, France.
Abstract:
The large antiferromagnetic coupling in the Mn(IV)-Mn(IV) bond in the Li(6)Ca(2)[Mn(2)N(6)] and Li(6)Sr(2)[Mn(2)N(6)] crystals (J = -739 and -478 cm(-1), respectively, with H = -JS(A)·S(B)) is studied using different theoretical methods: solid-state density functional theory calculations, molecular density functional theory, and post-Hartree-Fock calculations with large embeddings. This magnetic coupling is a challenge for theoretical methods because both correlation and polarization effects are crucial for the correct description of the bond. All methods predict a large antiferromagnetic coupling, but none of the considered methods give a quantitative agreement with the experimental values. The molecular methods, except B3LYP and CASPT2, underestimate the coupling for the calcium compound, while they overestimate it in the strontium compound, within 30%. These methods, on the other hand, strongly underestimate the decrease of the coupling between the two compounds, with the most correlated one predicting the same value for both compounds. The solid-state method overestimates the coupling within 60% but reproduces better their ratio. Analysis of the calculations shows that the magnetic coupling between the local π orbitals is not caused by a direct interaction but by the spin-polarized σ bond.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Ferromagnetism
Valence Bond Theory
Paramagnetism
Diamagnetism
Diamagnetism was discovered by Anton Brugmans in 1778 when he observed that bismuth gets repelled by magnetic fields, thus theorizing that diamagnets get repelled by magnets.

