Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hybrid Feature Learning for Wearable Stress Detection: Combining Domain Knowledge with Supervised Deep Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Patient Perceptions of Blockchain-Based Health Information Exchange: User-Centered Design Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

A Medical Decision Support System for Automatic Treatment Plan Generation Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025
Same author

Effective Requirements Engineering in Early-Stage Digital Health Startups.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025
Same author

C-Scrum: Agile and Automated Software Development for Digital Health.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025
Same author

Limits of immersion-free recording of holographic waveguide displays.

Optics letters·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (oSLO) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
12:22

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (oSLO) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Published on: August 4, 2018

Eye safety for scanning laser projection systems.

Annette Frederiksen1, Reinhold Fiess, Wilhelm Stork

  • 1Robert Bosch GmbH, CR/ARE2, Gerlingen-Schillerhöhe, Germany. annette.frederiksen@de.bosch.com

Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering
|June 14, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Laser scanning pico-projectors offer advantages but pose eye safety risks. Current laser safety standards overestimate hazards for these systems, necessitating new classification criteria.

More Related Videos

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
11:34

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

Published on: May 15, 2017

Laser-Induced Chronic Ocular Hypertension Model on SD Rats
06:34

Laser-Induced Chronic Ocular Hypertension Model on SD Rats

Published on: December 4, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (oSLO) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
12:22

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (oSLO) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Published on: August 4, 2018

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
11:34

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

Published on: May 15, 2017

Laser-Induced Chronic Ocular Hypertension Model on SD Rats
06:34

Laser-Induced Chronic Ocular Hypertension Model on SD Rats

Published on: December 4, 2007

Area of Science:

  • Optics and Photonics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Consumer Electronics

Background:

  • Laser-based scanning systems are emerging as a promising technology for pico-projectors, offering advantages in miniaturization, optical efficiency, and cost.
  • However, the high energy density of laser beams raises concerns regarding potential eye hazards, necessitating robust safety classifications.
  • Existing laser safety standards, designed for different projection technologies, may not be directly applicable to scanning systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the safety implications of laser scanning pico-projectors.
  • To evaluate the applicability of current laser safety standards to scanning systems.
  • To propose alternative methods for classifying laser scanning projectors based on their unique optical characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of optical conditions considering a two-dimensional extended light source model for laser scanners.
  • Review of dependencies between maximum luminous flux and scanning system parameters.
  • Comparison of existing laser safety regulations with the actual hazardous potential of scanning systems.

Main Results:

  • Current laser safety regulations lead to an overestimation of the hazardous potential for laser scanning projectors.
  • A detailed analysis of optical conditions as a two-dimensional extended light source is crucial for accurate assessment.
  • Maximum luminous flux is dependent on specific scanning system parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Existing laser safety standards require adaptation for laser scanning projector systems.
  • Further research is needed to define appropriate criteria for classifying the safety of laser scanning projectors.
  • Accurate classification is essential for balancing performance and eye safety in mobile projection applications.