The naringenin-induced proapoptotic effect in breast cancer cell lines holds out against a high bisphenol a background
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Preparation of Naringenin Solution for In Vivo Application
Published on: August 10, 2021
Pamela Bulzomi1, Alessandro Bolli, Paola Galluzzo
1Department of Biology, University Roma Tre, Viale G. Marconi 446, I-00146 Roma, Italy.
Abstract:
Fruit and vegetable consumption has generally been associated with the prevention or suppression of cancer. However, food could contain a multitude of chemicals (e.g., bisphenol A; BPA) that could synergize or antagonize the effects of diet-derived compounds. Remarkably, food containers (e.g., water and infant bottles) are the largest source of exposure to BPA for human beings. Here, the effects of the coexposure of naringenin (Nar, 1.0 × 10(-9) M to 1.0 × 10(-4) M) and BPA (1.0 × 10(-5) M) in estrogen-dependent breast cancer cell lines expressing (i.e., MCF-7 and T47D) or not expressing (i.e., MDA-MB-231) estrogen receptor α (ERα) are reported. Although both Nar and BPA bind to ERα, they induce opposite effects on breast cancer cell growth. BPA induces cell proliferation, whereas Nar only decreases the number of ERα-positive cells (i.e., MCF-7 and T47D). Notably, even in the presence of BPA, Nar impairs breast cancer cell proliferation by activating caspase-3. The molecular pathways involved require p38 activation, whereas, the BPA-induced AKT activation is completely prevented by the Nar treatment. As a whole, Nar maintains its proapoptotic effects even in the presence of the food contaminant BPA, thus, enlarging the chemopreventive potential of this flavanone.
More Related Videos
19:44Enhancement of Apoptotic and Autophagic Induction by a Novel Synthetic C-1 Analogue of 7-deoxypancratistatin in Human Breast Adenocarcinoma and Neuroblastoma Cells with Tamoxifen
Published on: May 30, 2012
09:19Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015