Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Ideal Trial: Defining Causal Estimands that Balance Relevance and Feasibility in Target Trial Emulations and Actual Randomized Trials.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

"Identifying variables that independently predict…" is not a well-defined research task.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Causal Machine Learning Methods and Use of Cross-Fitting in Settings With High-Dimensional Confounding.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

On the Uses and Abuses of Regression Models: A Call for Reform of Statistical Practice and Teaching.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Rejoinder to Commentaries on: On the Uses and Abuses of Regression Models: A Call for Reform of Statistical Practice and Teaching.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Handling Multivariable Missing Data in Causal Mediation Analysis Estimating Interventional Effects.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Recovery of information from multiple imputation: a simulation study.

Katherine J Lee1, John B Carlin

  • 1Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. katherine.lee@mcri.edu.au.

Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
|June 15, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Multiple imputation (MI) can improve precision for missing covariates but may introduce bias if the imputation model is poor, especially with high missingness. Benefits are minimal for missing exposure data.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Multiple imputation (MI) is increasingly used for missing data.
  • Concerns exist regarding its advantage over complete case analysis (CCA).
  • Poorly fitting imputation models can introduce bias, especially with substantial missing data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of MI versus CCA in estimating regression coefficients.
  • To assess the impact of missing data proportions (10-90%) on parameter estimates.
  • To investigate the effect of imputation model fit on bias and precision.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated datasets (n=1000) with missing data in a skewed covariate or binary exposure.
  • Multivariate normal imputation (MVNI) with log transformation for non-normality.
  • Comparison of bias, precision, MSE, and coverage between MI and CCA.

Main Results:

  • MI yielded less bias and greater precision for missing covariates compared to CCA.
  • Significant bias and under-coverage occurred when covariate skewness was not addressed.
  • Minimal precision gains from MI for missing binary exposure data.

Conclusions:

  • MI is beneficial for missing covariates but offers limited gains for missing exposure variables.
  • Inappropriate imputation models with high missingness can lead to unreliable results and bias.
  • Further research is needed to establish clear guidelines for effective MI application in epidemiology.