Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Regional variation in critical care evacuation needs for children after a mass casualty incident
1Department of Pediatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA. kanterr@upstate.edu
Insights
New York’s regions can evacuate pediatric critical care patients after a mass casualty incident (MCI). Large metropolitan areas like NYC can absorb all patients, while distant regions may benefit from helicopter transport for faster evacuation.
Area of Science:
- Disaster medicine
- Public health preparedness
- Pediatric critical care
Background:
- Assessing regional capacity for pediatric critical care is vital for mass casualty incident (MCI) response.
- Understanding evacuation dynamics is crucial for effective resource allocation during emergencies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the capacity of five New York State regions to accommodate 30 pediatric critical care patients post-MCI.
- To determine evacuation times to other regions if local capacity is exceeded.
Main Methods:
- A quantitative model simulated pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) vacancies using resource data and historical occupancy.
- Discrete event simulations modeled evacuation scenarios using ground ambulances and helicopters for critical care teams, and ground ambulances for local noncritical care teams.
Main Results:
- Evacuation needs ranged from 0 to 23 children across five regions.
- The NYC metropolitan area could accommodate all patients; nearby regions could evacuate excess patients to NYC within 12 hours via ground ambulance.
- Helicopter transport reduced evacuation times by 40%-44% for distant regions, while local noncritical care teams offered less expert care with reduced transport times.
Conclusions:
- Metropolitan areas with high PICU bed capacity are crucial resources for local MCIs and surrounding communities.
- Ground ambulance transport is effective for regions near metropolitan centers; helicopter transport is beneficial for distant regions.
- Utilizing local noncritical care teams reduces transport time but compromises expert care during MCI evacuations.
Objectives:
To determine the ability of five New York statewide regions to accommodate 30 children needing critical care after a hypothetical mass casualty incident (MCI) and the duration to complete an evacuation to facilities in other regions if the surge exceeded local capacity.
Methods:
A quantitative model evaluated pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) vacancies for MCI patients, based on data on existing resources, historical average occupancy, and evidence on early discharges and transfers in a public health emergency. Evacuation of patients exceeding local capacity to the nearest PICU center with vacancies was modeled in discrete event chronological simulations for three scenarios in each region: pediatric critical care transport teams were considered to originate from other PICU hospitals statewide, using (1) ground ambulances or (2) helicopters, and (3) noncritical care teams were considered to originate from the local MCI region using ground ambulances. Chronology of key events was modeled.
Results:
Across five regions, the number of children needing evacuation would vary from 0 to 23. The New York City (NYC) metropolitan area could accommodate all patients. The region closest to NYC could evacuate all excess patients to PICU hospitals in NYC within 12 hours using statewide critical care teams traveling by ground ambulance. Helicopters and local noncritical care teams would not shorten the evacuation. For other statewide regions, evacuation of excess patients by statewide critical care teams traveling by ground ambulance would require up to nearly 26 hours. Helicopter transport would reduce evacuation time by 40%-44%, while local noncritical care teams traveling by ground would reduce evacuation time by 16%-34%.
Conclusions:
The present study provides a quantitative, evidence-based approach to estimate regional pediatric critical care evacuation needs after an MCI. Large metropolitan areas with many PICU beds would be better able to accommodate patients in a local MCI, and would serve as a crucial resource if an MCI occurred in a smaller community. Regions near a metropolitan area could be rapidly served by critical care transport teams traveling by ground ambulance. Regions distant from a metropolitan area might benefit from helicopter transport. Using local noncritical care transport teams would involve shorter delays and less expert care during evacuation.
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
