Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Ferromagnetic Bare Metal Stent for Endothelial Cell Capture and Retention
11:01

Ferromagnetic Bare Metal Stent for Endothelial Cell Capture and Retention

Published on: September 18, 2015

Comparing coronary stent material performance on a common geometric platform through simulated bench testing.

J A Grogan1, S B Leen, P E McHugh

  • 1Biomechanics Research Centre (BMEC), Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Informatics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. j.grogan1@nuigalway.ie

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
|June 19, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Dual-VENC Four-Dimensional Flow MRI Framework for Analysis of Subject-Specific Heterogeneous Nonlinear Vessel Deformation.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2020
Same author

Quantification of the regional bioarchitecture in the human aorta.

Journal of anatomy·2019
Same author

Review of Mechanical Testing and Modelling of Thrombus Material for Vascular Implant and Device Design.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2017
Same author

Numerical Simulation of Stent Angioplasty with Predilation: An Investigation into Lesion Constitutive Representation and Calcification Influence.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2017
Same author

Mechanical Cell-Cell Communication in Fibrous Networks: The Importance of Network Geometry.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2017
Same author

Evaluation of cover effects on bare stent mechanical response.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2016

Absorbable metallic stents (AMSs) show promise for cardiovascular applications, matching permanent stents in strength and recoil but requiring larger struts. Further research is needed to improve flexibility and stiffness for widespread clinical adoption.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular engineering
  • Biomaterials science
  • Medical device design

Background:

  • Absorbable metallic stents (AMSs) offer an alternative to permanent stents, potentially reducing long-term patient risks.
  • Current AMS materials like magnesium and iron have mechanical limitations compared to stainless steel and cobalt-chromium alloys used in permanent stents.
  • Direct performance comparisons of AMSs and permanent stents on a unified platform are lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of AMSs (magnesium, iron) against permanent stent materials.
  • To evaluate key stent performance metrics including flexibility, radial strength, and recoil.
  • To identify limitations in current AMS materials and designs for future development.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated bench testing using finite-element modeling.

More Related Videos

Monitoring the Wall Mechanics During Stent Deployment in a Vessel
08:28

Monitoring the Wall Mechanics During Stent Deployment in a Vessel

Published on: May 8, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Ferromagnetic Bare Metal Stent for Endothelial Cell Capture and Retention
11:01

Ferromagnetic Bare Metal Stent for Endothelial Cell Capture and Retention

Published on: September 18, 2015

Monitoring the Wall Mechanics During Stent Deployment in a Vessel
08:28

Monitoring the Wall Mechanics During Stent Deployment in a Vessel

Published on: May 8, 2012

  • Comparison of magnesium, iron, and permanent stent materials on a common stent platform.
  • Evaluation of mechanical properties such as radial strength, flexibility, and recoil.

    • Main Results:

    • AMSs can achieve comparable recoil characteristics and radial strength to permanent stents.
    • Achieving comparable performance necessitates larger strut dimensions for AMSs.
    • AMSs demonstrated inferior performance in maximum absolute curvature and longitudinal stiffness compared to permanent stents.

    Conclusions:

    • AMSs show potential to match key performance metrics of permanent stents.
    • Design modifications, including larger strut dimensions, are needed for AMSs to meet clinical performance standards.
    • Further material development is crucial for improving the mechanical properties of AMSs, particularly stiffness and flexibility.