Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Uracil-DNA Glycosylase Assay by Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Published on: April 22, 2022
DFT study of the fragmentation mechanism of uracil RNA base
Leila Sadr Arani1, Pierre Mignon, Hassan Abdoul-Carime
1Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Institut des Sciences Analytiques, CNRS UMR 5280, 43 Bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Abstract:
The fragmentation process of the uracil RNA base has been investigated via DFT calculations in order to assign fragments to the ionisation mass spectrum obtained after dissociation induced by collision experiments. The analysis of the electronic distribution and geometry parameters of the cation allows selection of several bonds that may be cleaved and lead to the formation of various fragments. Differences are observed in the electronic behaviour of the bond breaking as well as the energy required for the cleavage. It is reported that N(3)-C(4) and N(1)-C(2) bonds are more easily cleaved than the C(5)-C(6) bond, since the corresponding energy barriers amount to ΔG = +1.627, +1.710, +5.459 eV, respectively, which makes the C(5)-C(6) bond cleavage almost prohibited. Among all possible formed fragments, the formation of the OCN(+) fragment for the peak at m/z = 42 Da is excluded because of an intermediate that was not observed experimentally and too a large free energy barrier. Based on the required free energy, it is observed that two fragment derivatives: C(2)H(4)N(+) and C(2)H(2)O˙(+) may be formed, with a small preference for C(2)H(4)N(+). This latter product is not formed through a retro Diels Alder reaction in contrast to C(2)H(2)O˙(+). The following sequence is proposed for the peak at 42 Da: C(2)H(4)N(+) (from N(1)-C(2), C(4)-C(5) cleavages) > C(2)H(2)O˙(+) (from N(3)-C(4), N(1)-C(2) and C(5)-C(6) cleavages) > C(2)H(4)N(+) (from N(1)-C(2), N(3)-C(4) and C(4)-C(5)) > C(2)H(2)O˙(+) (from C(5)-C(6), N(1)-C(2) and N(3)-C(4) cleavages) > NCO(+) (from N(1)-C(2), C(4)-C(5) and N(3)-C(4) cleavages). Finally the peak at 28 Da is assigned to CNH(2)(+) derivatives that can be formed through two different paths, the easiest one requiring 5.4 eV.
Related Concept Videos
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
RNA Editing
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
Transfer RNA Synthesis
Each of these chemical modifications is carried by a specific enzyme, post-transcription. All of these enzymes have unique base and site-specificity. Methylation, the most common chemical modification, is carried by at least nine different enzymes, with...

