Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Methods for the Study of Regeneration in Stentor
Published on: June 13, 2018
Quoting A.T. Still with rigor: an historical and academic review
1Canadian College of Osteopathy in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. janestark@on.aibn.com
Abstract:
The statements of Andrew Taylor Still, MD, DO, abound within the osteopathic literature. However, Still is sometimes misquoted, and corresponding references to his quotations are occasionally incomplete or inaccurate. There are several reasons why these errors continue to occur, including confusion surrounding the copyright dates and multiple editions of his books. In addition, less reliable, secondary sources of Still's words are often used instead of primary sources. To help resolve these problems, the author proposes 3 solutions. A list of Still's known published books, including the correct copyright date of The Philosophy and Mechanical Principles of Osteopathy, is provided. The disadvantages associated with using the 2 most popular secondary sources of Still's work are described. Guidelines from the 10th edition of the AMA Manual of Style are reviewed to assist authors, educators, and students in accurately citing material from older sources, such as Still's writings.
Related Concept Videos
Bronsted-Lowry Acids and Bases
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Review and Preview
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
AC Sources
