Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026
12:39
High-density Electroencephalographic Acquisition in a Rodent Model Using Low-cost and Open-source Resources
Published on: November 26, 2016
Electroencephalographic evidence of vector inversion in antipointing
Matthew Heath1, Jon Bell, Clay B Holroyd
1School of Kinesiology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada. mheath2@uwo.ca
Experimental Brain Research
|June 20, 2012
Summary
Antipointing movements create visual-field biases, suggesting a remapping of target locations. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) show later P300 differences, supporting a vector inversion hypothesis over attention reallocation.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Human Perception
Background:
- Mirror-symmetrical reaching movements, or antipointing, result in endpoint biases.
- These biases align with perceptual representations of visual space.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate behavioral and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) during pro- and antipointing.
- To differentiate between vector inversion and attention reallocation hypotheses for antipointing biases.
Main Methods:
- Concurrent behavioral analysis and ERP recordings during pro- and antipointing tasks.
- Analysis of early (N100) and late (P300) ERP components.
Main Results:
- Antipointing, but not propointing, showed visual-field-specific endpoint biases.
- N100 component was similar for both tasks, indicating comparable attention orienting.
- P300 amplitude differed significantly between tasks, linked to context-updating.
Conclusions:
- The P300 difference suggests antipointing involves remapping target locations (vector inversion).
- Behavioral and ERP data support perception-based visual networks mediating vector inversion.
