Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A UK framework for the assessment and integration of different scientific evidence streams in chemical risk assessment.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2024
Same author

Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2023
Same author

Lessons Learned From Presumptive Condition Lists in Veteran Compensation Systems.

Frontiers in public health·2022
Same author

Lifetime occupational exposures and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk in the UK Biobank cohort.

Thorax·2022
Same author

Health Impact of Environmental Tobacco Smoke in the Horne.

Reviews on environmental health·2021
Same author

Occupational exposure to inhaled pollutants and risk of airflow obstruction: a large UK population-based UK Biobank cohort.

Thorax·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Occupational cancer in Britain. Statistical methodology.

Sally J Hutchings1, Lesley Rushton

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK. s.hutchings@imperial.ac.uk

British Journal of Cancer
|June 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Researchers developed an attributable fraction (AF) method to estimate occupational cancer burden in Britain. This approach combines relative risk (RR) with exposure proportion for accurate burden assessment.

More Related Videos

In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose
13:04

In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose

Published on: October 14, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose
13:04

In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose

Published on: October 14, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Occupational epidemiology
  • Public health
  • Cancer research

Background:

  • Estimating the burden of occupational cancer is crucial for public health interventions.
  • Previous methods may not accurately capture the complex interplay of exposure and risk.
  • A robust methodology is needed to quantify cancer cases attributable to workplace exposures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a novel approach for estimating the current burden of occupational cancer in Britain.
  • To combine relative risk (RR) data with worker exposure proportions to calculate attributable fractions (AFs).
  • To provide a framework adaptable for other diseases and geographical regions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the attributable fraction (AF) by combining relative risk (RR) from epidemiological literature with exposure data from sources like the CARcinogen EXposure (CAREX) database and national surveys.
  • Defined a risk exposure period (REP) accounting for industry changes, staff turnover, and life expectancy.
  • Applied AFs to national cancer deaths and registrations, incorporating strategies to avoid double counting and minimize bias.

Main Results:

  • The developed AF approach provides a quantitative estimate of the occupational cancer burden in Britain.
  • The methodology successfully integrates diverse data sources, including epidemiological studies and national employment surveys.
  • The framework is adaptable for refining estimates with improved exposure and dose-response data.

Conclusions:

  • The attributable fraction (AF) method offers a reliable approach to estimate occupational cancer burden.
  • This methodology is flexible and can be adapted for various diseases, geographical locations, and advanced modeling.
  • Accurate estimation of occupational cancer is vital for targeted prevention strategies and resource allocation.